Abstract

BackgroundImmunosuppressive therapy of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is indicated during the active phase of disease. Intravenous steroids (IVGC) are effective in about 70% of patients, although unresponsiveness or relapse are observed. In previous studies, rituximab (RTX) has been shown to be effective in inactivating moderate-to-severe GO when used early in the disease, but its optimal dosage has never been studied in randomized clinical trials. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of RTX, based on a post-hoc analysis of two open label studies and one prospective trial randomized to IVGC.Methodsof 40 patients (35 women, 5 men), with active moderate-to-severe GO treated with RTX, 14 received a single dose of 100 mg (Group 1), 15 a single dose of 500 mg (Group 2) and 11 two 1000 mg doses, administered one week apart (Group 3). Thyroid function, TSH-receptor antibodies (TRAb) and peripheral CD19+ cells were measured. Primary endpoint was disease inactivation, measured as a decrease of the Clinical Activity Score (CAS) of at least two points. Secondary endpoints were improvement of proptosis, diplopia, quality of life and safety.ResultsBaseline CAS decreased significantly in all groups (P<0.0001), independently of GO duration or whether patients had newly occurring or relapsing GO after IVGC. Proptosis did not significantly change. There was an inverse correlation between the Gorman score for diplopia and RTX dose (P<0.01). The appearance score of the GO-QoL improved in Group 1 (P=0.015), and the visual function score, in Group 2 (P=0.04). A reduction of serum TRAb was observed in Group 1 (P=0.002) and Group 2 (P<0.0002), but not in Group 3. CD19+ cell decreased in all groups (P<0.01), independently of the dose.ConclusionsWe studied the optimal dosage of RTX in the treatment of active moderate-to-severe GO. In this analysis, we considered the efficacy of RTX in inactivating GO, in changing its natural course, its effect on disease severity and on the patients’ quality of life. Based on our clinical findings, and balancing the cost of therapy, a single 500 mg dose regimen is suggested in the majority of patients.

Highlights

  • Graves’ disease (GD) is a thyroid autoimmune disorder in which anti-thyrotropin (TSH) receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) with stimulating activity induce hyperthyroidism

  • Intravenous steroids have been shown to be effective in about 70% of patients, unresponsiveness and disease relapse are observed in a good proportion of patients (20-30%) [4]

  • There were no significant differences in baseline clinical and immunological features in the patients of the three groups of the study (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Graves’ disease (GD) is a thyroid autoimmune disorder in which anti-thyrotropin (TSH) receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) with stimulating activity induce hyperthyroidism. Medical treatment, based on immunosuppression, is indicated during the active phase of GO. Intravenous steroids have been shown to be effective in about 70% of patients, unresponsiveness and disease relapse are observed in a good proportion of patients (20-30%) [4]. Immunosuppressive therapy of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is indicated during the active phase of disease. Intravenous steroids (IVGC) are effective in about 70% of patients, unresponsiveness or relapse are observed. Rituximab (RTX) has been shown to be effective in inactivating moderate-to-severe GO when used early in the disease, but its optimal dosage has never been studied in randomized clinical trials. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of RTX, based on a post-hoc analysis of two open label studies and one prospective trial randomized to IVGC

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.