Abstract

The current study examined predictors of outcomes across two school clinician-delivered treatments (i.e., treatment as usual [TAU] or modular cognitive-behavioral therapy [M-CBT]) for youth with anxiety disorders. Predictors reflected two broad domains—therapist factors (i.e., education, years of experience, therapeutic orientation, work related stressors/barriers, self-efficacy, and attitudes towards evidence-based practices) and treatment-related factors (i.e., dosage, child compliance with treatment, therapeutic alliance, therapeutic nonspecifics, and proportion and quality of evidence-based structure elements). One hundred and ninety-five youth (mean age 10.98; 50.3% female, 53.5% non-Hispanic Caucasian) and 54 therapists (90.7% female, 72.2% non-Hispanic Caucasian) that were enrolled and randomized in a previous study (Ginsburg et al., 2020) participated. Results showed that incorporation of more evidence-based structure elements (e.g., agenda setting, assigning homework) and higher child compliance with treatment significantly increased odds of response to treatment. These findings provide important information about key ingredients to successful treatments, regardless of treatment condition/modality, and can be used to inform future training and implementation of school-based treatments for youth with anxiety disorders.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.