Abstract

Metastasis accounts for more than 90% of cancer related mortality, thus the most pressing need in the field of oncology today is the ability to accurately predict future onset of metastatic disease, ideally at the time of initial diagnosis. As opposed to current practice, what would be desirable is that prognostic, biomarker-based detection of metastatic propensity and heightened risk of cancer recurrence be performed long before overt metastasis has set in. Without such timely information it will be impossible to formulate a rational therapeutic treatment plan to favorably alter the trajectory of disease progression. In order to help inform rational selection of targeted therapeutics, any recurrence/metastasis risk prediction strategy must occur with the paired identification of novel prognostic biomarkers and their underlying molecular regulatory mechanisms that help drive cancer recurrence/metastasis (i.e. recurrence biomarkers). Traditional clinical factors alone (such as TNM staging criteria) are no longer adequately prognostic for this purpose in the current molecular era. FOXC1 is a pivotal transcription factor that has been functionally implicated to drive cancer metastasis and has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of heightened metastatic risk, at the time of initial diagnosis. In this review, we present our viewpoints on the master regulatory role that FOXC1 plays in mediating cancer stem cell traits that include cellular plasticity, partial EMT, treatment resistance, cancer invasion and cancer migration during cancer progression and metastasis. We also highlight potential therapeutic strategies to target cancers that are, or have evolved to become, “transcriptionally addicted” to FOXC1. The potential role of FOXC1 expression status in predicting the efficacy of these identified therapeutic approaches merits evaluation in clinical trials.

Highlights

  • Cancer screening strategies have proven to be successful in decreasing cancer-specific mortality in a variety of cancers [1,2,3,4]

  • We present our viewpoints on the master regulatory role that Forkhead box C1 (FOXC1) plays in mediating cancer stem cell traits that include cellular plasticity, partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), treatment resistance, cancer invasion and cancer migration during cancer progression and metastasis

  • MiR-138-5P inhibits FOXC1-mediated M/I MiR-138-5P inhibits FOXC1-mediated M/I FOXC1 drives proliferation, EMT, invasion HIF1a transcriptionally upregulates FOXC1 FOXC1 transcriptionally upregulates b-catenin lncRNA CCAT2 upregulates FOXC1 FOXC1 transcriptionally upregulates lysyl oxidase (LOX), ↑metastasis FOXC1 transcriptionally upregulates LINC00301, ↑HIF1a FOXC1 mediates PI3K/ AKT induced EMT, M/I miR-374c-5p inhibits FOXC1-mediated M/I FOXC1 is associated with radioresistance FOXC1 mediates PI3K/ AKT induced M/I miR-204 inhibits FOXC1mediated proliferation, M/I miR-495 inhibits FOXC1mediated proliferation, M/I FOXC1-FOXCUT form mRNA-lncRNA pair FOXC1 acts as transcriptional coactivator of, PBX1, ↑ZEB2 FOXC1 transcriptionally downregulates DKK1, activating Wnt FOXC1 transcriptionally upregulates GPX8, activating Wnt LINC00242 inhibits miR141, upregulates FOXC1 [92] [49] [93]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cancer screening strategies have proven to be successful in decreasing cancer-specific mortality in a variety of cancers [1,2,3,4]. As a result of not being able to “enrich” our clinical trial population with those patients who are most likely to derive survival benefit, we will ostensibly dilute the measured therapeutic efficacy in such trials, and may erroneously label a tested approach as being ineffective [10] Such biomarkers, once identified, may or may not play a functional or mechanistic role in driving the underlying aggressive biology contributing to the observed adverse outcomes. Once identified, may or may not play a functional or mechanistic role in driving the underlying aggressive biology contributing to the observed adverse outcomes For this reason, recurrence/metastasis risk prediction needs to be performed in conjunction with the identification of the pivotal underlying molecular drivers responsible for increasing the probability of suffering a recurrence/metastasis event. Studies supporting the role of FOXC1 as a powerful prognostic biomarker are summarized in Table 1 and includes both “solid” as well as “liquid” cancers like acute myelogenous

OS DMFS
Lung Lung Lung Lung
HL DLBCL
BREAST CANCER
LUNG CANCER
GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS
OTHER CANCERS
NFĸB SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAY
TGFb SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAY
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call