Abstract
During the introduction of a new once-daily nifedipine 60 mg osmotic delivery tablet to Canada in 2009, several patients previously maintained at target blood pressure on regimens that included nifedipine 60 mg daily were observed to have > 10 mmHg rises in their systolic pressure during follow-up. The only difference noted in their medication and clinical status was a substitution with the new 60 mg nifedipine formulation by their pharmacists. Three patients agreed to report home blood pressure for N of 1 studies in which all clinical parameters remained the same, but their nifedipine was repeatedly switched between the original and alternate formulations each week. Of 14 recorded switches, systolic pressure was higher on the alternate formulation 13 times. In at least some patients, the alternate pump technology appears less effective. This highlights the need for better bioequivalence criteria for comparing differing delivery technologies that artificially retard absorption of the drug.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.