Abstract

Various mechanisms of treatment resistance have been reported for glioblastoma (GBM) and other tumors. Resistance to immunotherapy in GBM patients may be caused by acquisition of immunosuppressive ability by tumor cells and an altered tumor microenvironment. Although novel strategies using an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), such as anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, have been clinically proven to be effective in many types of malignant tumors, such strategies may be insufficient to prevent regrowth in recurrent GBM. The main cause of GBM recurrence may be the existence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment involving immunosuppressive cytokines, extracellular vesicles, chemokines produced by glioma and glioma-initiating cells, immunosuppressive cells, etc. Among these, recent research has paid attention to various immunosuppressive cells—including M2-type macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells—that cause immunosuppression in GBM microenvironments. Here, we review the epidemiological features, tumor immune microenvironment, and associations between the expression of immune checkpoint molecules and the prognosis of GBM. We also reviewed various ongoing or future immunotherapies for GBM. Various strategies, such as a combination of ICI therapies, might overcome these immunosuppressive mechanisms in the GBM microenvironment.

Highlights

  • Glioblastoma and Its Epidemiological FeaturesGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal malignant brain tumor, classified as gradeIV by the World Health Organization (WHO), and reportedly diagnosed in 12.0% of all brain tumor patients [1,2,3]

  • Nduom and coauthors reported that PD-L1 expression was a poor prognosis marker in 94 GBM patients [25]

  • We have previously reported that PD-1/PD-L1 expression in primary tumors does not correlate with GBM prognosis [24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction—Glioblastoma and Its Epidemiological Features

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal malignant brain tumor, classified as grade. Cancers 2020, 12, 1960 as carmustine-loaded polymers (Gliadel wafers) without TMZ [8] and an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody (bevacizumab) added to standard therapies [9] did not significantly improve the OS of initially diagnosed GBM patients. 1/2 mutation; telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation; histone H3 mutations; epigenetic modifications of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation; and 1p19q co-deletion as prognostic markers of malignant glioma [10,11]. In GBM, IDH1/2 mutations and MGMT methylation are already considered prognostic and therapeutic markers but further therapeutic efficacy indicators are desired [10,11,12]. Anaplastic astrocytomas (WHO grade III) typically have IDH1 mutations and MGMT promotor methylation is an important prognostic marker [13]. Regarding the changes in molecular expression before and after recurrence of GBM, the expression of p53 and EGFRvIII are decreased in recurrent tumor cells [15,16]

Glioblastoma Immune Microenvironment
Complex crosstalk tumor cells and various cells in glioma
Association between Expression of ICMs and Prognosis in GBM
GBM Immunotherapy and Microenvironmental Changes after Recurrence
Ongoing Clinical Trials
A Pilot Surgical Trial to Evaluate Early Immunologic Pharmacodynamic
Findings
Future Perspectives and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call