Abstract

Current recommendations from various international expert committees generally concur in their definitions of borderline and high triglyceride levels, with small but important differences between recommendations in the definition of normal levels. However, population-based data on triglyceride levels are poorly developed in most countries, making difficult any international comparisons of prevalences of hypertriglyceridemia using the new definitions. However, it is probable that there should be considerable differences in the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia, probably due to a mixture of genetic and environmental influences. The management of hypertriglyceridemia must continue to emphasize the detection and correction of secondary causes, even though the specific secondary causes may vary between countries. Dietary and exercise interventions must deal with local customs and resources, including striking international differences in alcohol consumption. Pharmacologic therapies will likely increase in use if they follow the trends in countries with available data. Although various drugs are available, nicotinic acid and fibric acid derivatives remain the drugs of choice. Considerably more research is needed to describe these international differences in etiology, prevalence and management practices of hypertriglyceridemia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.