Theory of Political Culture the Origin of Conflict in the International System

Abstract

The traditional Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism international relations theories cannot offer adequate and sufficient approaches to its existing conflicts in the world politics. Realism with the idea of security and military power, and liberalism with a focus on the role of the economy in international system and constructivism in the formation of the international system, have all largely lost their effectiveness in the world ahead. The emergence of new conflicts has transcended the geographical borders of countries and encompassed the peripheral regions, and finally, like rings of zenith, has connected all the sensitive regions of the world. Theories of the Cold War era in international relations were formulated and taken into account with the assumptions of their time, and now, like the Berlin Wall, it is only a symbol of the Cold War. Because China was not yet an emerging economic power and had not built artificial islands in the South China Sea, Russia was embroiled in internal bombings and oligarchy, and Putin had not yet annexed the Crimean peninsula to Russia and participated in the war in Syria, North Korea has been involved in International Atomic Energy Agency resolutions and has not yet acquired a nuclear bomb, and Iran has been involved in a war with Saddam Hussein in Iraq and has not yet acquired long-range missiles and was not expanding its influence in the Middle East, and for the US-led Western world, human rights and democracy in the world were valuable, and most importantly, the United States did not yet have a populist president, and so on. We have entered a new era of relations between States in the international system, for which we have not yet been able to choose a name due to the ambiguity in the concept and interconnectedness of events and the complexity of relations. Turkey's distance from West and proximity to Russia, Iran's proximity to China, and the rise of populism, the isolation and polarization of American society and unprecedented tensions in US-China relations and disorder is seen in Brexit in the European Union. Recognizing the predominant source of these changes and the origins of the conflicts and the elements involved and the functions helps us to improve knowledge from a particular situation to make an idea in the realities of the world politics and provides a suitable context for educational and research activities with a more accurate perspective. It is my hypothesis: “The fundamental source of future conflicts will be neither border disputes nor economic competitions nor ideological differences nor will change of leadership in the world, but the political culture is predominant source of the conflicts in the world”. An Explanatory Research conducted to identify the nature and extent of the political culture and its impact on conflict in international relations.