Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is one of the most relevant concepts in the field of social cognition, particularly in the case of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Literature showing that individuals with ASD display deficits in ToM is extensive and robust. However, some related issues deserve more research: the heterogeneous profile of ToM abilities in children with ASD and the association between different levels of ToM development and social, pragmatic, and adaptive behaviors in everyday life. The first objective of this study was to identify profiles of children with ASD without intellectual disability (ID), based on explicit and applied ToM knowledge, and compare these profiles with a group of children with typical development (TD). A second objective was to determine differences in symptom severity, adaptive/social behavior, and pragmatic abilities between the profiles identified. Fifty-two children with a clinical diagnosis of ASD without ID and 37 children with TD performed neuropsychological ToM tasks and two vocabulary and memory tests. In addition, all of their mothers completed different questionnaires about applied ToM abilities, severity of ASD symptoms, adaptive/social skills, and pragmatic competence. Two subgroups were identified in the cluster analysis carried out with explicit and applied ToM indicators. The “Lower ToM abilities” profile obtained significantly lower scores than the “Higher ToM abilities” profile on all the ToM measures. Furthermore, the analysis of covariance, controlling for vocabulary and working memory (ANCOVAs), showed statistically significant differences in applied ToM abilities between the two groups of children with ASD without ID and the group with TD. However, only the group with “Higher ToM abilities” achieved similar performance to the TD group on the verbal task of explicit ToM knowledge. Finally, the “Lower ToM abilities” cluster obtained significantly higher scores on autism symptoms (social and communication domains) and lower scores on adaptive behavior and pragmatic skills than the cluster with “Higher ToM abilities.” Taken together, these findings have implications for understanding the heterogeneity in ToM skills in children with ASD without ID, and their differential impact on social, communicative, and adaptive behaviors.

Highlights

  • The Theory of Mind (ToM) is a broad, complex, and multifaceted construct, defined as the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and to others, making it possible to explain and predict behavior (Premack and Woodruff, 1978)

  • In order to confirm the Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) diagnosis for the present study, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ; Rutter et al, 2003) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-revised (ADIR; Rutter et al, 2006) were administered, taking into account the recommended cut-off points

  • The first goal of the analysis was to examine whether children with ASD were more likely to cluster into a single group or multiple groups on the basis of measures of ToM skills

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Theory of Mind (ToM) is a broad, complex, and multifaceted construct, defined as the ability to attribute mental states (beliefs, desires, intentions) to oneself and to others, making it possible to explain and predict behavior (Premack and Woodruff, 1978). Research currently supports the subdivision of ToM into implicit and explicit components that describe different aspects of social stimulus processing (Frith and Frith, 2012). The implicit component of the ToM acts quickly, spontaneously, and unconsciously. It allows the correct anticipation of behavior without a deliberate reflection on the mental state of the other. In this regard, the tasks involving the categorization of facial expressions according to the emotion expressed are methods for evaluating implicit competence

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call