Abstract

Parallel-coupled muffler designs incorporating lengths of perforated tubing, such as concentric tube resonators (bean cans) and expansion chambers with perforated tubes extending into the chamber, cannot be modeled by traditional methods. In a recent paper, [J. W. Sullivan and M. J. Crocker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, S123(A) (1976)] a closed form solution for the transmission loss of a concentric tube resonator was presented, but the solution was restricted to the perforate having a constant specific impedance along the length of the tube. If the perforate impedance should vary along the tube either by design or by nonlinear effects a closed form solution is no longer possible and it then becomes necessary to resort to an approximate solution. One such solution is presented in which the tube and its backing volume are subdivided into discrete elements (slices) each described by a 4 × 4 transmission matrix. The advantages and disadvantages of this rather simple method compared with finite difference or finite element methods are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.