Abstract

To better understand the nature of temporary spatial clusters (TSC's) in industrial marketing settings, this conceptual paper first provides a theoretical synthesis of spatial understanding from the industrial marketing (IM) and economic geography (EG) fields, focusing particularly on Doreen Massey's work on relational space. This leads to a conceptual schema for organizing the IM literature in terms of spatiality, and which also helps clarify the ontological nature of TSCs. We then move to introduce the notion of institutional boundary-work, drawing on the work of Thomas Gieryn, and Andrea Brighenti's examination of territorology, to conceptualize the activities of market actors engaged in the ongoing social accomplishment of TSCs. Such activities, we suggest, involve these actors ‘marching’ boundaries to assume network influence and maintain market order in IM settings. In summary, therefore, our paper addresses two fundamental questions: i) How do we conceptualize the form of TSCs in IM settings? And, ii) what function(s) are TSCs performing (and how is this being undertaken) in IM? The paper closes by providing methodological guidance for how a research agenda on TSCs within IM activity might be developed, followed by a summary of the managerial implications that emerge from our theorizations.

Highlights

  • Spatial and temporal perspectives on business relationships have been discussed for some time in the industrial marketing (IM) literature (Andersson and Mattsson, 2010; Araujo and Easton 2012; Håkansson and Lundgren, 1997; Halinen and Törnroos, 1995; Halinen, Medlin and Törnroos, 2012; Hedaa and Törnroos, 2008; Medlin 2004; Tidström and Hagberg-Andersson 2012)

  • To better understand the nature of temporary spatial clusters (TSC’s) in industrial marketing settings, this conceptual paper first provides a theoretical synthesis of spatial understanding from the industrial marketing (IM) and economic geography (EG) fields, focusing on Doreen Massey’s work on relational space

  • Our paper addresses two fundamental questions: i) How do we conceptualize the form of temporary spatial clusters’ (TSCs) in IM settings? And, ii) what function(s) are TSCs performing in IM? The paper closes by providing methodological guidance for how a research agenda on TSCs within IM activity might be developed, followed by a summary of the managerial implications that emerge from our theorizations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial and temporal perspectives on business relationships have been discussed for some time in the industrial marketing (IM) literature (Andersson and Mattsson, 2010; Araujo and Easton 2012; Håkansson and Lundgren, 1997; Halinen and Törnroos, 1995; Halinen, Medlin and Törnroos, 2012; Hedaa and Törnroos, 2008; Medlin 2004; Tidström and Hagberg-Andersson 2012). We believe TSCs have an ability to shape and facilitate wider business relationships in IM settings, and posit that they can be better understood through the application of geographical theory in the form of Doreen Massey’s ideas on relational spatiality (Massey, 2005), as well as concepts from social theory which help inform the notion of institutional boundary-work - the work of Thomas Gieryn (Gieryn, 1983, 1999) and Andrea Brighenti (Brighenti, 2010).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call