Abstract
This article explores, through a basic conceptual-theoretical analysis and a review of relevantliterature, the usefulness of employing the communicative action theory of Jürgen Habermasin theorising the elusive notions of participation and participatory communication theory asapplicable to project based development (Burnside-Lawry, 2012; Chang & Jacobson, 2010;Jacobson, 2003; Jacobson & Storey, 2004; Ramella & De La Cruz, 2000; Servaes, 1999). Theproblem with defining participation is that it is ambiguous – both notionally and in actual contexts– as the concept comprises a myriad of dissimilar epistemologies, methodologies and imaginedgoals, while also representing disparate evaluative measures in thinking about and determiningwhether or not participation has actually occurred in its various applied settings (Chitnis, 2005;Huesca, 2008; Jacobson & Storey, 2004; McAnany, 2012; Melkote & Steeves, 2001; Morris,2003; Wilkins, 2000).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
