Abstract

This conceptual paper explores the iterative relationship between system design and use for the development process of sustainability control systems (SCS). Building upon Adler and Borys’ seminal framework (Adm Sci Q 41(4):61–89, 1996) as an analytical tool, it suggests that SCS are characteristically distinct, and more research into the dual role of control (i.e. control over based on system design and control in situ based on system use by the individual user) is necessary for future theorisations of the SCS. It poses that for sustainable futures that extend beyond organisational boundaries, more attention is required on individual general employees in management accounting and control frameworks as instrumental for performance outcomes. To this end, individual values, borne from the extra-organisational context, are considered important alongside organisational ones for the development of SCS. Thus, the paper bridges perspectives on system characteristics, the individual and performance outcomes by offering a theoretical framework for future research. It also extends studies on accounting as a social practice by emphasising the extra-organisational factors that influence internal accounting systems. Finally, it expounds upon the notion of social control as an individual-level phenomenon, necessary for sustainability. This expanded theoretical perspective also has implications for practice by encouraging managers to think strategically about how systems are received from the perspective of the user. This can encourage more commitment to the sustainability cause from the outset, as well as over spatial and temporal boundaries.

Highlights

  • Sustainability control systems (SCS) are often viewed as separate management control systems (MCS) that address social and environmental concerns (Burritt and Saka 2006; Gond et al 2012)

  • Local systems are more important for sustainability given that broader developmental goals, which may be set as organisational strategic targets such as the sustainable development goals (SDGs), constitute an overarching framework, rather than a concrete solution

  • This conceptual paper sought to address how the development process of SCS could be understood by combining the dual role of control based on system design and use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Arjaliès and Mundy 2013; Riccaboni and Leone 2010; Rodrigue et al 2013 Journeault et al 2016) This inadvertently assumes sustainability performance as an organisational-level phenomenon that is primarily achieved through the design of formalised, bureaucratic systems by managers to control employees for effective outcomes; i.e. a technical approach to control The primary contribution rests on offering a developed theoretical framework that captures the multifaceted concepts that the development process of SCS often entails Does it shed light on the broader nature of control, it expounds upon the notion of sustainability MAC as a social practice with unique characteristics.

Sustainability management accounting and control
SCS characteristics
The dual role of control
Control in situ
Social control
Boundary spanners
Adler and Borys’ enabling and coercive bureaucracy
Overview of the framework
Applications in extant management accounting and control research
Inferences of control in situ via the process characteristics
Potential applications for sustainability MAC
The relationship between control over and control in situ
Theoretical development
Conceptual development
Summative model
Concluding discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call