Theoretical Study on the Mechanism of the Cycloaddition Reaction between Alkylidene Carbene and Ethylene

Theoretical study on mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between dimethyl methylene carbene and ethylene

The mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichlorovinylidene (R1) and formaldehyde (R2) has been investigated with MP2 and B3LYP /6-31G* methods, including geometry optimization, vibrational analysis, and energy for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. Energies from both methods are also further corrected by CCSD(T)/6-31G* single-point calculations. Although the relative energies do differ especially for the loose conformations such as transition states and intermediates, generally the geometries predicted by MP2 and B3LYP are in good agreement. CCSD(T) relative energies for the stationary points predicted by MP2 and B3LYP agree quite well, and they are more comparative to those from B3LYP than those from MP2. The results also show that both three-centered and [2+2] cycloadditions can happen in concerted pathways. The former leads to a stable three-membered ring product (P1), while the two intermediates (INT1c and INT1d) from the latter are not so stable and will rearrange into either P1 or a more stable four-membered ring product (P2). The orbital interactions are also discussed for the leading intermediates and products.

The mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichloro‐germylene carbene and aldehyde has been investigated with MP2/6‐31G* method, including geometry optimization and vibrational analysis for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. The energies of the different conformations are calculated by zero‐point energy and CCSD (T)//MP2/6‐31G* method. From the potential energy profile, it can be predicted that the reaction has two competitive dominant reaction pathways. The channel (A) consists of four steps: (1) the two reactants (R1, R2) first form an intermediate INT2 through a barrier‐free exothermic reaction of 142.4 kJ/mol; (2) INT2 then isomerizes to a four‐membered ring compound P2 via a transition state TS2 with energy barrier of 8.4 kJ/mol; (3) P2 further reacts with aldehyde (R2) to form an intermediate INT3, which is also a barrier‐free exothermic reaction of 9.2 kJ/mol; (4) INT3 isomerizes to a germanic bis‐heterocyclic product P3 via a transition state TS3 with energy barrier of 4.5 kJ/mol. The process of channel (B) is as follows: (1) the two reactants (R1, R2) first form an intermediate INT4 through a barrier‐free exothermic reaction of 251.5 kJ/mol; (2) INT4 further reacts with aldehyde (R2) to form an intermediate INT5, which is also a barrier‐free exothermic reaction of 173.5 kJ/mol; (3) INT5 then isomerizes to a germanic bis‐heterocyclic product P5 via a transition state TS5 with an energy barrier of 69.4 kJ/mol. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011

The mechanism of the cycloadditional reaction between singlet dichloro-germylidene(R1) and (acetaldehyde(R2) has been investigated with MP2/6-31G* method, including geometry optimization, vibrational analysis and energies for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. From the potential energy profile, we predict that the cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichloro-germylidene and acetaldehyde has two competitive dominant reaction pathways. Going with the formation of two side products (INT3 and INT4), simultaneously. The two competitive reactions both consist of two steps: (1) two reactants firstly form a three-membered ring intermediate (INT1) and a twisted four-membered ring intermediate (INT2), respectively, both of which are barrier-free exothermic reactions of 44.5 and 63.0 kJ/mol; (2) then INT1 and INT2 further isomerize to a four-membered ring product (P1) and a chlorine-transfer product (P2) via transitions (TS1 and TS2), respectively, with the barriers of 9.3 and 1.0 kJ/mol; simultaneously, P1 and INT2 react further with acetaldehyde(R2) to give two side products (INT3 and INT4), respectively, which are also barrier-free exothermic reaction of 65.4 and 102.7 kJ/mol.

The mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction between singlet dimethyl-silylene carbene and formaldehyde has been investigated with MP2/6-31G* method, including geometry optimization and vibrational analysis for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. The energies of the different conformations are calculated by zero-point energy and CCSD (T)//MP2/6-31G* method. From the potential energy profile, it can be predicted that the reaction has two competitive dominant reaction pathways. The main products of first dominant reaction pathway are a planar four-membered ring product (P4) and its H-transfer product (P4.2). The main product of second dominant reaction pathway is a silicic bis-heterocyclic compound (P5). © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011

Theoretical study on the mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between silylene carbene and formaldehyde

The cycloaddition reaction mechanism between interstellar molecules, ketenimine and methyleneimine, has been systematically investigated employing the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) method in order to better understand the reactivity of nitrogenous cumulene ketenimine with the C =N double bond compound methyleneimine. Geometry optimizations and vibrational analyses have been performed for the stationary points on the potential energy surfaces of the system. Calculations show that five-membered cyclic carbene intermediates could be produced through pericyclic reaction processes between ketenimine and methyleneimine. Through the subsequent hydrogen transfer processes, carbene intermediates can be isomerized to the pyrazole and imidazole compounds, respectively. The present study is helpful to understand the formation of prebiotic species in interstellar space. The cycloaddition reaction mechanism between interstellar molecules, ketenimine and methyleneimine, has been systematically investigated theoretically. The products of this reaction are pyrazole and imidazole compounds, respectively.

The mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction between singlet H2Si=Si: and formaldehyde has been investigated with the CCSD(T)//MP2/6-31G* method. From the potential energy profile, it could be predicted that the reaction has three competitive dominant reaction pathways. The reaction rules presented is that the 3p unoccupied orbital of the Si: atom in H2Si=Si: inserts the π orbital of formaldehyde from the oxygen side, resulting in the formation of an intermediate. Isomerization of the intermediate further generates a four-membered ring silylene (the H2Si–O in the opposite position). In addition, the [2+2] cycloaddition reaction of the two π-bonds in H2Si=Si: and formaldehyde also generates another four-membered ring silylene (the H2Si–O in the syn-position). Because of the unsaturated property of the Si: atom in the two four-membered ring silylenes, the two four-membered ring silylenes could further react with formaldehyde, generating two silicic bis-heterocyclic compounds. Simultaneously, the ring strain of the four-membered ring silylene (the H2Si–O in the syn-position) makes it isomerize to a twisted four-membered ring product.

The mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between singlet dimethylmethylenesilylene and formaldehyde has been investigated with MP2/6‐31G* method, including geometry optimization and vibrational analysis for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. The energies of different conformations are calculated by CCSD(T)//MP2/6‐31G* method. From the potential energy surface, it can be considered in thermodynamics and dynamics that reaction (1) and reaction (4) are the two dominant competitive reaction channels of cycloaddition reaction between dimethylmethylenesilylene and formaldehyde. The reaction process of reaction (1) is that: the two reactants (R1, R2) first form intermediates INT1a and INT1b through two reaction paths, a and b, which are barrier‐free exothermic reactions of 31.8 and 43.9 kJ/mol; then, INT1a and INT1b isomerize to a four‐membered ring product P1 via transition states TS1a and TS1b, with energy barriers of 26.3 and 24.4 kJ/mol. Reaction (4) also has two reaction paths, a and b, each of which consists of three steps are as follows: (i) the two reactants (R1, R2) first form intermediates INT3a and INT3b, which are barrier‐free exothermic reactions of 64.5 and 44.2 kJ/mol. (ii) INT3a and INT3b further react with formaldehyde (R2) to form intermediates INT4a and INT4b, through barrier‐free exothermic reactions of 22.9 and 22.2 kJ/mol. (iii) INT4a and INT4b then isomerize to form silapolycyclic product P4 via transition states TS4a and TS4b, with energy barriers of 39.7 and 29.3 kJ/mol. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008

The mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichloromethylene silylene and formaldehyde has been investigated using a MP2/6-31G* method, including geometry optimization and vibrational analysis for the stationary points on the potential energy surface. The energies of different conformations are calculated by CCSD(T)//MP2/6-31G* method. From the potential energy profile, it can be predicted that the cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichloromethylene silylene and formaldehyde has three competitive dominant reaction channels: (1) the two reactants first form a highly strained three-membered ring intermediate INT1c, which then isomerizes to an active four-membered ring product P1 via a transition state TS1c by ring-increasing reaction; Subsequently, P1 further reacts with formaldehyde to form the more stable silapolycyclic product P2; (2) the two reactants first form a four-membered ring intermediate INT1b by the [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction, which then isomerizes to the four-membered ring product P3.1 via a transition state TS3.1, resulting from the chlorine transfer reaction; (3) INT1b further reacts with formaldehyde to form a silapolycyclic intermediate INT4, which then isomerizes to a silapolycyclic product P4 via a transition state TS4.

Theoretical study on the mechanism of cycloaddition reaction between dimethyl germylidene and formaldehyde

The cycloaddition reaction mechanism between interstellar molecules ketenimine and HCN has been investigated employing the second-order M?ller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) method in order to better understand the reactivity of nitrogenous cumulene ketenimine with carbon-nitrogen triple bond compound HCN. Geometry optimizations and vibrational analyses have been performed for the stationary points on the potential energy surfaces of the system. The calculated results show that it can be produced the five-membered cyclic carbene intermediates through pericyclic reaction processes between ketenimine and HCN. Through the following H-transfer processes, carbene intermediates can isomerize to the pyrazole and imidazole compounds, respectively. The present study is helpful to understand the formation of prebiotic species in interstellar space.

The cycloaddition reaction mechanism between interstellar molecules ketenimine and acetonitrile has been systematically investigated employing the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory method in order to better understand the reactivity of heterocumulene ketenimine with acetonitrile. Geometry optimizations and vibrational analyses have been performed for the stationary points on the potential energy surfaces of the system. Calculations show that five-membered cyclic carbene intermediates could be afforded through pericyclic reaction processes between ketenimine and acetonitrile. Through the following intramolecular H-transfer processes, carbene intermediates can be isomerized to the corresponding 2-methylimidazole and 3-methylpyrazole derivatives, respectively. In addition, imidazole and pyrazole compounds can be produced through the intermolecular H-transfer processes on the basis of the formed cyclic carbene intermediates. The present study is helpful to understand the formation of prebiotic species in interstellar space.

The cycloaddition reaction mechanisms between interstellar molecule ketenimine and unsaturated hydrocarbon (ethyne and ethylene) have been systematically investigated employing the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) method. Geometry optimizations and vibrational analyses have been performed for the stationary points on the potential energy surfaces of the system. The calculated results show that it can be produced the five-membered cyclic carbene intermediates through pericyclic reaction processes between ketenimine and ethyne (or ethylene). For the reaction between ketenimine and ethyne, through the following H-transferred processes, carbene intermediate can be isomerized to the pyrrole compounds. For the reaction between ketenimine and ethylene, carbene intermediate can be isomerized to the pyrroline compounds. The present study is helpful to understand the reactivity of nitrogenous cumulene ketenimine and the formation of prebiotic species in interstellar space.

Mechanism of the cycloadditional reaction between singlet dichloro-germylidene and formaldehyde has been investigated with MP2/6–31G* method, including geometry optimization, vibrational analysis and energies for the involved stationary points on the potential energy surface. Prom the potential energy profile, we predict that the cycloaddition reaction between singlet dichloro-germylidene and formaldehyde has two competitive dominant reaction pathways, going with the formation of two side products (INT3 and INT4), simultaneously. Both of the two competitive reactions consist of two steps, two reactants firstly form a three-membered ring intermediate INT1 and a twisted four-membered ring intermediate INT2, respectively, both of which are barrier-free exothermic reactions of 41.5 and 72.3 kJ/mol; then INT1 isomerizes to a four-membered ring product P1 via transition state TS1, and INT2 isomerizes to a chlorine-transfer product P2 via transition state TS2, with the barriers of 2.9 and 0.3 kJ/mol, respectively. Simultaneously, P1 and INT2 further react with formaldehyde to form INT3 and INT4, respectively, which are also barrier-free exothermic reaction of 74.9 and 88.1 kJ/mol.