Abstract

The geometric and electronic structures of Si$_{n}$, Si$_{n}^{+}$, Si$_{n}^-$, AlSi$_{n-1}$ and PSi$_{n-1}$ clusters (2 l n l13) has been investigated using the ab initio molecular orbital theory under the density functional theory formalism. Relative stabilities of these clusters have been analyzed based on their binding energies, second difference in energy ($Δ^{2}$E) and fragmentation behavior. The equilibrium geometry of the neutral and charged Si$_{n}$ clusters shows similar structural growth. The geometries of the Si$_{n}^{+}$ and AlSi$_{n-1}$ are similar to those of the Si$_{n}$, but with small distortions. The ground state geometries of the AlSi$_{n-1}$ clusters shows that the impurity Al atom prefers to substitute for the Si atom, that has the highest coordination number in the host Si$_{n}$ cluster. However for Si$_{n}^-$, n=6, 8, 11, and 13, significant changes have been observed in the ground state geometries of the negatively charged clusters as compared to their neutral counterparts. In general the geometries of the P substituted silicon clusters remain similar to that of negatively charged Si$_{n}$ clusters with small local distortions. In general, the average binding energy of charged clusters is found to be higher than that of neutral Si$_{n}$ clusters. However, significant differences have been observed in the electronic structure of neutral and charge cluster leading to their different stability pattern. While for neutral clusters, the Si$_{10}$ is magic, the extra stability of the Si$_{11}^{+}$ cluster over the Si$_{10}^{+}$ and Si$_{12}^{+}$bears evidence for the magic behavior of the Si$_{11}^{+}$ cluster, which is in excellent agreement with the recent experimental observations (ref. [29]). Similarly for AlSi$_{n-1}$ clusters, which is iso-electronic with Si$_{n}^{+}$ clusters show extra stability of the AlSi$_{10}$ cluster suggesting the influence of the electronic structures for different stabilities between neutral and charged clusters. For iso-electronic PSi$_{n-1}$ clusters, it is found that although for small clusters (n 4), the effect is opposite. The fragmentation behavior of all these clusters shows that while small clusters prefers to evaporate monomer, the larger ones dissociates into two stable clusters of smaller size. Finally, a good agreement between experimental and our theoretical results suggests good prediction of the lowest energy isomeric structures for all clusters calculated in the present study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call