Abstract

The factors responsible for the binding of Hoechst 33258 with DNA residues have been investigated in this work using the AMI method. First and foremost, it is found that, although all crystal structure determinations indicate a preference for binding at AT rich sites, the hydrogen bond strength is actually greater for complexes with cytosine and guanine. From this, it has been inferred that other factors such as electrostatic, van der Waals interactions and nonbonded contacts with the walls of the minor groove have a strong role to play in the binding process. The hydrogen bond is found to be stronger for complexation with the thymine 02 than with the adenine N3, in line with experimental observations. Combined QM/MM studies on the drug complexed with the Dickerson-Drew dodecamer reveal that binding induces structural changes in both the ligand as well as DNA. Electron donating substituents at the para position in the phenyl ring of Hoechst 33258 lead to stronger binding with DNA. A correlation with the octanol/water partition coefficients points to the importance of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.