Abstract

Systematic evaluation of method and basis set on the structure and energetics of organocuprate(I) and organocopper(III) species has been carried out. Various structures of organocuprate(I) and organocuprate(III) complexes were optimized with the HF, MP2, and B3LYP methods, and compared with the structures determined by X-ray crystallography (i.e., Me(2)Cu(I)(-), (CF(3))(4)Cu(III)(-)). Both the MP2 and B3LYP methods reasonably reproduce the X-ray structures while the HF method does not. Using larger basis set and incorporating the relativistic effects for Cu afford the best results. In the studies on the energetics of a Libond;Cu cluster model (Me(2)CuLi. LiCl) and Me(3)Cu model with the MP2, MP3, MP4DQ, MP4SDQ, CCSD(T), and B3LYP methods, the B3LYP method gives energetics similar to those obtained with the CCSD(T) method with much less cost, and hence, is judged to be the best practical method. The studies have shown that B3LYP method with the basis set incorporating the relativistic effective core potentials for Cu and the 6-31G* basis set for the rest is the theoretical method that is the most cost-effective for the studies of the structure and energetics of organocuprate(I) and organocopper(III) species.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.