Abstract

Geometric branch-and-bound methods are commonly used solution algorithms for non-convex global optimization problems in small dimensions, say for problems with up to six or ten variables, and the efficiency of these methods depends on some required lower bounds. For example, in interval branch-and-bound methods various well-known lower bounds are derived from interval inclusion functions. The aim of this work is to analyze the quality of interval inclusion functions from the theoretical point of view making use of a recently introduced and general definition of the rate of convergence in geometric branch-and-bound methods. In particular, we compare the natural interval extension, the centered form, and Baumann's inclusion function. Furthermore, our theoretical findings are justified by detailed numerical studies using the Weber problem on the plane with some negative weights as well as some standard global optimization benchmark problems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.