Abstract
AbstractDuring this contribution, we present a benchmark investigation on the applicability of several Minnesota functionals from various classes like local meta‐generalized and meta‐nonseparable gradient approximations, hybrids, and range‐separated hybrids for describing the valence and Rydberg excitation energies of some organic compounds from different categories. Furthermore, the performances of Minnesota density functionals from density functional theory are also assessed against a wave function theory based approach in the context of excite states calculations, symmetry adapted cluster‐configuration interaction (SAC‐CI) method. Pragmatically, the singles and doubles linked excitation operators are considered in the SAC‐CI wave functions. With more or less different accountabilities of the considered methods, it is shown that the M06‐2X, M05‐2X, and M11 functionals have the best performances for valence excited states. On the other hand, for Rydberg excited states although the SAC‐CI method outperforms others, the statistical analyses reveal that the efficiency of some Minnesota functionals is also respectable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.