Abstract

This study is motivated to predict such drift concentration effects for SCB frames with the perfect flag-shape hysteretic behavior. Nonlinear time history analyses are conducted to compare and elucidate different deformation mechanisms between BRB and SCB frames. An elastic-plastic static model is established to predict the static drift concentration factor (DCFS) for the SCB frame under static lateral loads, where influential parameters include the column-to-frame stiffness ratios, α, and the SCB's post-yielding stiffness ratio, βk,2. To capture the dynamic loading effect, a regressive formula is further developed as the dynamic amplification factor by normalizing the dynamic drift concentration factor (DCFD) with the DCFS under static loads. The results show that unlike BRB frames with drift concentrated in the bottom story, SCB frames often feature peak story drifts in the top story. As opposed to BRB frames, the equivalent lateral loads do not feature an inverted triangle distribution but a parabolic distribution along the building height. The drift concentration effect for the SCB frame is reliably predicted by multiplying static DCFS with the corresponding closed-form formula for the dynamic amplification factor. The predicted DCFD is also utilized to identify a design range of βk,2 (i.e., 0.2–0.4) to effectively control the peak story drift and drift concentration for SCB frames.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.