Abstract

Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) are dioxins-like compounds and are formed along with polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in thermal and combustion procedures. Chlorophenols (CPs) are the most important forerunners of PCNs. A comprehensive comprehension of PCN formation procedure from CPs is a precondition for reducing the discharge of PCNs. Experiments on the formation of PCNs from CPs have been hindered by PCN toxicity and short of precise detection methods for active intermediate radicals. In this work, PCN formation mechanism in gas-phase condition from 2-chlorophenol (2-CP) as forerunner was studied by quantum chemistry calculations. Numbers of energetically advantaged formation routes were proposed. The rate constants of key elementary steps were calculated over 600–1200 K using canonical variational transition-state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling contribution (SCT) method. This study illustrates formation of PCNs with one chlorine atom loss from 2-CP is preferred over that without chlorine atom loss. In comparison with formation of PCDFs from 2-CP, PCN products are less chlorinated and have lower formation potential.

Highlights

  • Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) show similar geochemical characters, biological properties, structures and toxicities to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs)

  • Similar to other persistent organic pollutants (POPs), PCNs are ubiquitous contaminants found in air, snow, sediments and biota, even in the polar environments [4]

  • We present an overall density functional theory (DFT) research of PCN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) show similar geochemical characters, biological properties, structures and toxicities to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs). Chloro-DOHB can form chlorinated dihydrofulvalene by two carbon monoxide elimination steps and two ring close reactions, followed by PCN formation via routes similar to the mechanism proposed by Melius [21,22,23,32]. This mechanism can explain the more similar formation connection of PCN with PCDF than PCDD in thermal processes. Kim could not explain his experimental observation wherein the yield of monochlorinated naphthalenes (MCNs) is significantly higher than that of dichlorinated naphthalenes (DCNs) from 2-CP, according to the similar formation pathway number of MCNs and DCNs in his proposed mechanism [21,22]. Some energetically preferred routes were proposed to parallel the formation possibility of different PCN products and explain experimental observations

Results and Discussion
PCN Formation from the Following Reactions of IM5
PCN Formation from the Following Reactions of IM10
Formation Comparison PCNs and PCDFs from 2-Chlorophenol
Rate Constant Calculations
Density Functional Theory
Kinetic Calculation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call