Abstract

Cross-sectional comparisons of well-being between dog owners and non-owners commonly generate inconsistent results. Focusing on the uniqueness of the relationship might help address this issue and provide a stronger foundation for dog-related psychotherapeutic interventions. This study aims to evaluate the impact of dog-related activities (e.g., exercising the dog) on owner hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being. It was also hypothesised that psychological closeness to the dog would affect these well-being outcomes. For this study, 1030 dog owners aged over 18 years old answered an online questionnaire about the impact of 15 groups of dog-related activities on their well-being. Ordinal regressions were used to estimate the mean response (and its uncertainty) for each outcome, while conditioning for psychological closeness to the dog and controlling for several key covariates. Tactile interactions and dog playing were significantly more beneficial than other activities for hedonic well-being, and dog training and dog presence for eudaimonic well-being. In contrast, dog health issues and behavioural problems were linked to decrements in these well-being outcomes. Higher psychological closeness to the dog predicted greater improvement in well-being in positive dog-related activities. Our quantitative study validates the general findings of previous qualitative work and lays the groundwork for future longitudinal studies.

Highlights

  • Despite frequent reports of the benefits of pet ownership to human well-being based on qualitative studies, quantitative findings based largely on cross-sectional comparisons between owners and non-owners are inconsistent [1,2,3,4,5]

  • The findings indicate that different dog-related activities have varying impacts on human hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being, as suggested in

  • The findings indicate that different dog-related activities have varying impacts on our previous qualitative work [18,24,25]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite frequent reports of the benefits of pet ownership to human well-being based on qualitative studies, quantitative findings based largely on cross-sectional comparisons between owners and non-owners are inconsistent [1,2,3,4,5]. These mixed results highlight the complexity of the pet-human relationship and the need for theoretical frameworks that account for the diversity of the relationship [4]. Are the benefits related to dog walking, tactile interactions, the routine of looking after the animal, or to the animal’s presence? Similar questions are being increasingly asked, not

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call