Theoretical Basis for the Observed Break inML/MwScaling between Small and Large Earthquakes

Abstract

Abstract For a set of earthquakes in a perfectly elastic medium and provided that stress drop and rupture velocity do not vary systematically as a function of magnitude and that the instrument response has been corrected for, M L ∝ M w over the entire range for which M L can be determined. In practice, however, we observe that M L and M w deviate from this 1:1 scaling relation. Detailed analysis of a natural earthquake sequence and of a case of induced seismicity show that, for small events (in general, for M w below 2–3), M L ∝1.5 M w , in agreement with the results of other studies. This behavior can be reproduced with synthetic earthquake source time functions convolved with a causal Q operator using independently determined Q ‐values. A key result of both the data analysis and the modeling exercise is that, for small events below a certain magnitude, observed pulse widths and equivalently corner frequencies remain practically constant. Thus, in an attenuating medium, the signals of small earthquakes constitute essentially the impulse response of the medium, scaled by the seismic moment. A simple theoretical demonstration shows that under these circumstances the observed proportionality of 1.5 between M L and M w is a necessary consequence of the intrinsic scaling properties of amplitude and duration of the moment‐rate function versus seismic moment, as well as of the frequency response of an attenuating medium. As a consequence of this and of the bias introduced by the response of the Wood–Anderson seismometer for the larger events, the Gutenberg–Richter relation based on M L loses its physical justification and, with respect to M w , leads to different b ‐values for small and large events. Electronic Supplement: Figures of hypocenter locations of the induced seismicity below Basel and of seismograms showing the degree of similarity among signals.