Abstract
The paper attempts to analyze conflicting Korean situation and find conflict resolution alternatives in application of international theories and models. In describing these, the paper focuses on theoretical review and its application related to conflicting Korean situation, mainly as concerns military issues. Then, the concern is to consider conflict resolution alternatives in application of the related international theories and models in the situation of Korean conflict. On the whole, the international theories - rational choice theory, game theory, theory of interdependent decision, negotiation theory, bargaining theory, and prospect theory - are analytically reviewed. The models of rational model, action-reaction process model, stimulus-response model, punishment model are also looked over. They are to contribute theoretically to find rational value-maximizing mode of behaviors and actions for producing cooperation and positive sum game in the action-reaction process based upon rationality and rational choice with an expectation of getting gains and benefits, and loss-averse at least in the situation of Korean conflict.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
