Abstract

This paper presents the theoretical screening of 23 low-cost deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as absorbents for effective removal of the main impurities from biogas streams using a conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS). Based on thermodynamic parameters, i.e., the activity coefficient, excess enthalpy, and Henry’s constant, two DESs composed of choline chloride: urea in a 1:2 molar ratio (ChCl:U 1:2), and choline chloride: oxalic acid in a 1:2 molar ratio (ChCl:OA 1:2) were selected as the most effective absorbents. The σ-profile and σ-potential were used in order to explain the mechanism of the absorptive removal of CO2, H2S, and siloxanes from a biogas stream. In addition, an economic analysis was prepared to demonstrate the competitiveness of new DESs in the sorbents market. The unit cost of 1 m3 of pure bio-methane was estimated to be in the range of 0.35–0.37 EUR, which is comparable to currently used technologies.

Highlights

  • Due to European Union (EU) energy policies to promote the utilization of renewable resources, there has been a significant increase in biogas plants and the level of biogas production [1,2]

  • Water was omitted in the calculations because it was assumed to be removed before the biogas enters the absorption column

  • The activity coefficient is a thermodynamic parameter that is associated with the affinity of siloxanes, H2 S, CO2, and CH4 to deep eutectic solvents (DESs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to European Union (EU) energy policies to promote the utilization of renewable resources, there has been a significant increase in biogas plants and the level of biogas production [1,2]. Biogas can be produced by anaerobic digestion from different waste materials (i.e., manure and food residue, wastewater sludge, or industrial by-products) or landfill gas. Biogas mainly consists of methane (50–70%) and contaminants including carbon dioxide, water, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and numerous organic compounds (i.e., siloxanes) [3,4,5]. The presence of these contaminants prevents the use of biogas as an alternative transport fuel or natural gas substitute. Carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and siloxanes are the most problematic [6,7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.