Abstract

Allosteric transcription factors undergo binding events at inducer binding sites as well as at distinct DNA binding domains, and it is difficult to disentangle the structural and functional consequences of these two classes of interactions. We compare the ability of two statistical mechanical models—the Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) and the Koshland-Némethy-Filmer (KNF) models of protein conformational change—to characterize the multi-step activation mechanism of the broadly acting cyclic-AMP receptor protein (CRP). We first consider the allosteric transition resulting from cyclic-AMP binding to CRP, then analyze how CRP binds to its operator, and finally investigate the ability of CRP to activate gene expression. We use these models to examine a beautiful recent experiment that created a single-chain version of the CRP homodimer, creating six mutants using all possible combinations of the wild type, D53H, and S62F subunits. We demonstrate that the MWC model can explain the behavior of all six mutants using a small, self-consistent set of parameters whose complexity scales with the number of subunits, providing a significant benefit over previous models. In comparison, the KNF model not only leads to a poorer characterization of the available data but also fails to generate parameter values in line with the available structural knowledge of CRP. In addition, we discuss how the conceptual framework developed here for CRP enables us to not merely analyze data retrospectively, but has the predictive power to determine how combinations of mutations will interact, how double mutants will behave, and how each construct would regulate gene expression.

Highlights

  • Transcriptional regulation lies at the heart of cellular decision making, and understanding how cells modify the myriad of players involved in this process remains challenging

  • MWC and KNF models which tie each mutant’s behavior to its subunit composition. We find that both frameworks can characterize data from a suite of cyclic-AMP receptor protein (CRP) mutants using a compact set of parameters, but only the interpretation of the MWC parameters is consistent with structural knowledge of CRP

  • We first formulate a description of cAMP-CRP binding using a generalized form of the MWC model, where the two subunits of each CRP molecule fluctuate concurrently between an active and inactive state

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transcriptional regulation lies at the heart of cellular decision making, and understanding how cells modify the myriad of players involved in this process remains challenging. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.