Abstract
The Author considers the section of Zur Lehre von der Geschichte und von der Freiheit (joined then to Negative Dialektik ) where Adorno refuses Kantian’s thesis that liberty is following a rule of reason. The Kantian thesis is developed by idealist theorists who identify liberty and duty while Adorno’s point is that reason becomes pratical one only if it recovers that somatic impulse that the reflection process has at first rejected. This analysis should improve our understanding of Adorno’s vision of liberty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
