Theodicy and Deconstruction

Abstract

We come finally to a problem central and specific to Christian theology. In brief, how may we sustain a belief in a God of love in the face of evil and the inexplicable and apparently unjustified woes and sufferings imposed on creatures in a world supposedly created and sustained by this beneficent deity? Why do millions of children starve or die of disease; why terrible earthquake; why war and its cruelty? Why are we, in St Paul’s words, the slaves of sin? A theodicy might crudely be defined as a writing, doctrine or theory intended, in the Miltonic phrase, to ‘justify the ways of God to men’ and to uphold a sense of the justice of God before the fact of evil, human waywardness and disobedience. The Judaeo-Christian literary traditions abound in theodicies as diverse in form and time as the Book of Job, Milton’s Paradise Lost (1667), Leibniz’s Theodicy (1710) or Austin Farrer’s Love Almighty and Ills Unlimited (1962). Above all, perhaps, the early chapters of Genesis explore our awareness of humanity’s radical imperfection, of ‘original sin’. It has already been suggested in Chapter 5 (see above p. 113) that this awareness prompts the recognition that a theological criticism should determine the moral relationship between the imperfect reader and the text — a criticism alive not only to human imperfection but also to our innate ability to know and love the truth.KeywordsFictional CharacterChristian TheologyParadise LostHuman ArtistMetaphysical TraditionThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.