Abstract

BackgroundDo Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions are made in hospitals throughout the globe. International variation in clinicians' perception of DNACPR decision-making and implementation and the factors influencing such variation has not previously been explored. MethodsA questionnaire asking how DNACPR decisions are made, communicated and perceived in their country was composed: it consisted of seven closed-answer and four open-answer questions. It was distributed to 143 medical professionals with prior published material relating to DNACPR decisions. Under-represented geographical areas were identified and an additional 34 physicians were contacted through medical colleagues and students at the university hospital from which this study was based. The respondents had 4 weeks to answer the questionnaire. Results78 responses (44%) were received from 43 countries. All continents were represented. 88% of respondents reported a method for implementing DNACPR decisions, 90% of which discussed resuscitation wishes with the patient at least half of the time. 94% of respondents thought that national guidance for DNACPR order implementation should exist; 53% of countries surveyed reported existence of such guidance. Cultural attitudes towards death, medical education and culture, health economics and the societal role of family were commonly identified as factors influencing perception of DNACPR decisions. ConclusionsThe majority of countries surveyed make some form of DNACPR decision but differing cultures and economic status contribute towards a heterogeneity of approaches to resuscitation decision-making. Adequacy of relevant medical education and national policy are two areas that were regularly identified as impacting upon the processes of DNACPR decision-making and implementation.

Highlights

  • It has been recognised across geographical boundaries that certain medical interventions may cause more overall harm than benefit

  • Physicians who had previously published material relating to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions within their

  • The ‘PubMed’ search yielded 372 hits, 171 of which were about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) decisions. 143 of these provided current email addresses. 58 authors on this list responded to the questionnaire

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been recognised across geographical boundaries that certain medical interventions may cause more overall harm than benefit One such intervention is attempted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR).[1,2] Given that cardiopulmonary arrest is the ‘final common pathway’ for all of us, Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions have become common-place in many countries.[3,4]. International variation in clinicians’ perception of DNACPR decision-making and implementation and the factors influencing such variation has not previously been explored. 88% of respondents reported a method for implementing DNACPR decisions, 90% of which discussed resuscitation wishes with the patient at least half of the time. Adequacy of relevant medical education and national policy are two areas that were regularly identified as impacting upon the processes of DNACPR decision-making and implementation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.