Abstract

As of the early 1980s, despite the wealth of evidence from experimental animal models, the extensive epidemiologic evidence, the powerful genetic evidence, and the strongly suggestive clinical intervention trial results, most clinicians still remained unpersuaded regarding the relevance of the lipid hypothesis. What was needed was a well-designed, large-scale, long-term, double-blind study demonstrating a statistically significant impact of treatment on coronary heart disease events. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) had laid the groundwork for such a study as early as 1970, but the study was not completed and the results published until 1984. This study, the Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, showed that treatment with a bile acid binding resin reduced major coronary events in hypercholesterolemic men by 19%, with a P value of 0.05. The NIH followed this up with a national Consensus Development Conference on Lowering Blood Cholesterol to Prevent Heart Disease. For the first time, the NIH now went on record advocating screening for hypercholesterolemia and urging aggressive treatment for those at high risk. The Institute initiated a national cooperative program to that end, the National Cholesterol Education Program. For the first time, preventing coronary heart disease became a national public health goal.

Highlights

  • As of the early 1980s, despite the wealth of evidence from experimental animal models, the extensive epidemiologic evidence, the powerful genetic evidence, and the strongly suggestive clinical intervention trial results, most clinicians still remained unpersuaded regarding the relevance of the lipid hypothesis

  • Lees, had just published a highly influential series of reviews in the New England Journal of Medicine [4,5,6]. They proposed a classification of abnormalities of serum lipids based on total cholesterol and triglyceride levels plus the lipoprotein pattern revealed by paper chromatography

  • It was proposed that each of the Lipid Research Clinics would participate in a multicenter trial to definitively test the “lipid hypothesis.”

Read more

Summary

THE CORONARY PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL

The keystone in the arch of evidence linking blood cholesterol to heart disease In June 1970, Theodore Cooper, Director of the National Heart and Lung Institute, asked Donald S. Lees, had just published a highly influential series of reviews in the New England Journal of Medicine [4,5,6] They proposed a classification of abnormalities of serum lipids based on total cholesterol and triglyceride levels plus the lipoprotein pattern revealed by paper chromatography. Possibly even more so, the Panel was asked, “Do you believe the evidence is sufficient to warrant the detection of and some form of individual treatment of hyperlipidemia?” Of the 21 experts, 20 answered yes They recognized that the evidence that such treatment would reduce heart attack rates, and by how much, was still limited. Others, including Levy, felt strongly that a definitive intervention trial should be an integral part of the package and get a very high priority As it turned out, the Lipid Research Clinics program was approved and funded with almost no opposition. It was proposed that each of the Lipid Research Clinics would participate in a multicenter trial to definitively test the “lipid hypothesis.”

The CPPT
Designing the trial
How did the candidate drugs look?
Study design
Potential ethical problems associated with the placebo group
The trials and tribulations of the CPPT directors
The CPPT comes in with the proof
Reception by the profession and by the press
What was the nature of the criticisms?
CHOLESTEROL TO PREVENT CORONARY HEART DISEASE
The response of the profession and of the press
The position of the Food and Drug Administration
Findings
THE NATIONAL CHOLESTEROL EDUCATION PROGRAM
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call