Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a degenerative disease affecting language while leaving other cognitive facilities relatively unscathed. The agrammatic subtype of PPA (PPA-G) is characterized by agrammatic language production with impaired comprehension of noncanonical filler-gap syntactic structures, such as object-relatives [e.g., The sandwich that the girl ate (gap) was tasty], in which the filler (the sandwich) is displaced from the object position within the relative clause to a position preceding both the verb and the agent (the girl) and is replaced by a gap linked with the filler. One hypothesis suggests that the observed deficits of these structures reflect impaired thematic integration, including impaired prediction of the thematic role of the filler and impaired thematic integration at the gap, but spared structure building (i.e., creation of the gap). In the current study, we examined the on-line comprehension of object-relative and subject-relative clauses in healthy controls and individuals with agrammatic and logopenic PPA using eye-tracking. Eye-movement patterns in canonical subject-relative clause structures were essentially spared in both PPA groups. In contrast, eye-movement patterns in noncanonical object-relative clauses revealed delayed thematic prediction in both agrammatic and logopenic PPA, on-time structure building (i.e., gap-filling) in both groups, and abnormal thematic integration in agrammatic, but not logopenic, PPA. We argue that these results are consistent with the hypothesis that agrammatic comprehension deficits reflect impaired thematic integration.

Highlights

  • Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a degenerative disease affecting language while leaving other cognitive facilities relatively unscathed (Mesulam et al, 2012)

  • For subject-relative clauses (Table 2A), the PPA-G participants (79.4% correct) performed significantly more poorly than the PPA-L participants (90.0% correct; p = 0.02), and both groups were significantly worse than controls (97.4% correct; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.009 respectively)

  • The two PPA groups did not differ from controls or each other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a degenerative disease affecting language while leaving other cognitive facilities relatively unscathed (Mesulam et al, 2012). The logopenic and semantic subtypes (PPA-L, PPA-S, Thematic Integration in Primary Progressive Aphasia respectively) do not show grammatical impairments in production or comprehension. In an object-relative clause structure [e.g., The sandwich that the girl ate (gap) was tasty], the theme (the sandwich) has been displaced from the object position following the verb [at the (gap) site] to a position preceding the verb (ate) and the agent (the girl). This displacement creates a filler-gap dependency, in which the displaced element (the sandwich) is the filler for the gap. In a subject-relative clause [The girl that (gap) ate the sandwich ran away], the agent (the girl) has been extracted from the subject position of the relative clause [i.e., the (gap) position], resulting in a preserved canonical agent-verb-theme order

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.