Abstract
Topmost interlayer spacings and three measures of their associated uncertainties obtained with the reliability index proposed recently by Pendry (1980) are compared with results available from the authors' previous analyses with the reliability index proposed by Zanazzi and Jona for the surfaces Ni(311), Cu(311), Zr(0001), Rh(110)-c(2*2)-S and Rh(100)-(2*2)-S. Structural conclusions are essentially identical from both approaches. Advantages of the Pendry approach include its much shorter times for computation, and its tendency to give lower uncertainties for the interlayer spacing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
