Abstract

In 1 Timothy 2:11–15 women are forbidden to teach and have authority over men in the church. The ground for this instruction is the creation account in Genesis 2 that asserts the priority of Adam over Eve in the order of creation. The second reason for the instruction is the deception of Eve according to the account of the Fall in Genesis 3. This pericope has elicited arguments between advocates of egalitarianism and complementarianism revolving over the issues of grammar, the context of the Ephesian church with regard to false teachings and the comparison of this text with the other writings of Paul, for those that subscribe to the authorship of Paul. The contention of this article is that verse 15 provides a major clue as to how this text should be understood. In addition, the author’s rhetoric in this text is interrogated with regard to the text’s own internal literary and theological logic. In this regard, the author is found to be inconsistent in his outlook, for the grace that was poured out abundantly on him: a blasphemer, a persecutor and a violent man and on account of his ignorance andunbelief (1 Tm 1:12–16) is apparently, being denied women on account of Eve’s deception.

Highlights

  • As part of the pastorals, 1 Timothy is a veritable tool in the hands of Pauline scholars who are interested in the development of Pauline thought and ideas over time (MacDonald 1988)

  • Another option of reading could be ‘women shall be rescued from the dangers associated with child bearing, if they continue to abide in faith and walk in love.’

  • The means by which they would not be regarded as sinners is by them giving birth to children and their continuing in faith and love

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As part of the pastorals, 1 Timothy is a veritable tool in the hands of Pauline scholars who are interested in the development of Pauline thought and ideas over time (MacDonald 1988). Exegesis has rather been a tool to advocate one viewpoint against another and has not brought any consensus on the issues raised It is the contention of this article that a reading of the pericope in light of its literary-theological context can lead to a more fruitful understanding of the passage and the book as a whole. The difference in our presentations lies in the fact that she reads the text as an allegory (Mouton 2012:115–128) It is argued, that 1 Timothy 2:11–15 is the most vitriolic and disparaging comment on women in the whole of the New Testament, if not in the whole Bible. The hypothesis of this article is that 1 Timothy is an occasional letter and reading it as such does not disparage its value as the word of God but rather puts it firmly in its historical context going by the clues given within the text, and this necessarily imposes restraint on its readers and interpreters in terms of its application

Methodology
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call