The within-day and between-day reliability of using sacral accelerations to quantify balance performance

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the between-day and within-day reliability of a sacral mounted accelerometer to quantify balance performance and different balance metrics. DesignExperimental, cross-sectional. SettingLaboratorial experiment. ParticipantsThirty healthy volunteers. Main outcome measuresBalance tasks were double leg stance, tandem stance and single leg stance with eyes open and closed. Performance was measured by converting accelerations into path length (PL, length of the sway trace), jerk (jerkiness of sway trace) and root mean square (RMS) of the accelerations. ResultsWithin-day ICC for PL were excellent (mean 0.78 95%CI 0.68–0.89), with Jerk and RMS demonstrating means of 0.60 and 0.47, respectively. The mean percentage minimal detectable change (MDC) within-day were smallest for PL and varied with task.Between-day ICC were smallest for PL (mean 31.4%; 95%CI 17.6–45.3%), but more varied for Jerk and RMS. The mean percentage MDC was small for PL (mean 6.1%, 95%CI 5.0–7.2). No significant differences were determined for measurements between-days for any metric or task. PL had the highest discriminatory value between the 8 tasks. ConclusionsThe sacral mounted accelerometer reliably measured balance performance within- and between-days. The PL is the recommended metric as it was the most reliable, most discriminatory and most sensitive to change.