Abstract
‘Doing the will of God’, or seeking to do it, is a notion close to the centre of, at any rate, Christian, Jewish and Moslem religion. So too is the notion of accepting happenings as God’s Will—Fiat voluntas tua. In the latter notion, God’s Will is something to be accepted rather than accomplished. Where the Will of God is something to be sought and accomplished, then it may be given as a final reason for doing what is believed to be in accord with it. Is it then connected necessarily or contingently with morality? If necessarily, then what is added to ‘This is right’ by saying ‘This is the Will of God’, at least as far as the content of the action goes? If the connection is contingent, then the moral judgement that this is right could conflict with the religious judgement that this is in accordance with the Will of God, and if both can be given as finalising reasons we could be faced with two conflicting ultimate demands. If there is a divergence, and the moral demand is said to be subordinate to the religious demand, this would be a claim that religion should in such cases supersede morality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.