Abstract

The GGGGCC (G4C2) repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the most common cause of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD) and ALS–FTLD, as well as contributing to sporadic forms of these diseases. Screening of large cohorts of ALS and FTLD cohorts has identified that C9ORF72-ALS is represented throughout the clinical spectrum of ALS phenotypes, though in comparison with other genetic subtypes, C9ORF72 carriers have a higher incidence of bulbar onset disease. In contrast, C9ORF72-FTLD is predominantly associated with behavioural variant FTD, which often presents with psychosis, most commonly in the form of hallucinations and delusions. However, C9ORF72 expansions are not restricted to these clinical phenotypes. There is a higher than expected incidence of parkinsonism in ALS patients with C9ORF72 expansions, and the G4C2 repeat has also been reported in other motor phenotypes, such as primary lateral sclerosis, progressive muscular atrophy, corticobasal syndrome and Huntington-like disorders. In addition, the expansion has been identified in non-motor phenotypes including Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia. It is not currently understood what is the basis of the clinical variation seen with the G4C2 repeat expansion. One potential explanation is repeat length. Sizing of the expansion by Southern blotting has established that there is somatic heterogeneity, with different expansion lengths in different tissues, even within the brain. To date, no correlation with expansion size and clinical phenotype has been established in ALS, whilst in FTLD only repeat size in the cerebellum was found to correlate with disease duration. Somatic heterogeneity suggests there is a degree of instability within the repeat and evidence of anticipation has been reported with reducing age of onset in subsequent generations. This variability/instability in expansion length, along with its interactions with environmental and genetic modifiers, such as TMEM106B, may be the basis of the differing clinical phenotypes arising from the mutation.

Highlights

  • One of the most interesting features of hexanucleotide repeat expansions of C9ORF72 is that the associated phenotype is extremely variable and except in certain pedigrees, the expansion does not appear to be 100 % penetrant [1]

  • It was discovered in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and/or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) [2, 3] many of the original studies of cohorts of C9ORF72-related patients noted the presence of other clinical phenotypes in probands and family members, at higher frequencies than would be expected by chance [4]

  • The variability in, and within, clinical presentations of C9ORF72-related disease [4] is a source of hope as well as a challenge as it suggests that multiple disease modifiers are at work, each of which is a potential therapeutic target

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most interesting features of hexanucleotide repeat expansions of C9ORF72 is that the associated phenotype is extremely variable and except in certain pedigrees, the expansion does not appear to be 100 % penetrant [1]. A smaller study identified a positive correlation between repeat length and age of onset in C9ORF72related patients with a variety of neurodegenerative phenotypes including FTLD, ALS and Alzheimer’s disease [1] but as described above, this may reflect the individual’s age at the time of sampling. Benussi and colleagues [6] reported on C9ORF72-related FTLD families which showed evidence of anticipation with a mean difference in age of onset between the parent and offspring of 9.8 years; This was seen by Chio et al [76], with age of onset 7 years earlier in the subsequent generation in Italian ALS cases Whether this related to expansion size is still to be determined, perhaps through Southern blotting analysis of parents and offspring DNA. It has been demonstrated that small expansions of approximately 50 repeats do not reduce transcription [86] possibly because smaller expansions do not Expansion Length

Dipeptide Repeat Protein
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call