Abstract

The ascent of the western European powers to global hegemony in the early modern period remains a central problematic in social scientific inquiry. In seeking to comprehend the causes that facilitated the European passage to colonial domination and capitalist modernity, scholars have looked to a series of interdependent institutional and cultural developments that unfolded cumulatively over the long-term, and which issued in greatly enhanced capacities in coercive and productive power. Revisionist scholarship is now challenging this understanding. Dismissing the consensus view as a mirage of Eurocentric and Orientalist mythologizing, revi- sionists are insistent that the major societies across Eurasia were all progressing along a comparable course of modernizing development, and that the West's surge to global supremacy was a late and contingent historical outcome. It will be argued here that the revisionist position is both empirically suspect and analytically incoherent. Affirmed in counterpoint are the explanatory principles of path-dependent historical trajectories and the pervasive structural integration of social formations. Resume : La montee des pouvoirs de l'Europe de l'Ouest vers une hegemonie globale au debut de la periode moderne demeure une question inquietante dans les sondages socio-scientifiques. Pour comprendre les causes qui ont facilite la domination coloniale des Europeens et le capitalisme des temps modernes, les erudits se sont tournes vers des developpements institutionnels et culturels xxxxxx

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call