Abstract

Fiscal policy is one of the popular instruments used by government to provide balance to growth in the national economy and market. In Malaysia’s context, fiscal policy is implemented using such as the annual budgets, Malaysia Plans, and multiple stimulus packages aimed at boosting Malaysia’s economy especially during the recent lock down which has threatened to cause an economic crisis due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, one of the Malaysian Government’s biggest spending using fiscal policy is its development expenditure, and tax is one of the largest contributions used to support this development expenditure. In order to attract investors to Malaysia, critical features such as benefits, facilities, and social welfare have been designed by decision-makers in each formulated policy. Initiatives such as inter-governmental forums, trade agreements and discussions are platforms that can be used to share and respond to economic problems. However, the existence of competition and foreign policy have become major challenges to the country’s efforts to attract investors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between Malaysia’s federal government development expenditure with foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow, as well as the country’s openness towards investment. The two dimensions of asymmetric FDI inflow were analysed to see how they react to government expenditure from 1970 until 2019 using the Linear and Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag method. Findings from the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model (NARDL) model indicated that FDI has a positively significant effect on fiscal accumulation for development expenditure. In conclusion, increases in government expenditure increase FDI inflow into Malaysia in both the short- and long-run. Hence, government development expenditure behaviour represents accelerating economic growth in the Malaysian context, and it is proven to have a significant impact towards economic growth in the long-run. This study contributes to empirical literature on the relationship between federal government development expenditure and FDI inflow, particularly the effect of openness to investment into a developing country towards economic growth in the long- run.

Highlights

  • The “invisible hand” concept in the open market system is a metaphor introduced by economist Adam Smith to represent the role of the government

  • The current study aims at determining how Malaysia’s fiscal policy measures interact with foreign direct investment

  • These factors may explain why foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow is affected when the government decreases its volume of allocation on development expenditure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The “invisible hand” concept in the open market system is a metaphor introduced by economist Adam Smith to represent the role of the government. In this perspective, the government plays the role as an arbitrator to provide balance to growth in both the national economy and the market. A popular instrument used by the government is fiscal policy. Malaysia has its annual budgets, Malaysia Plans, and stimulus packages as part of its fiscal policy used to boost the economy. The government introduced more than five stimulus packages: PRIHATIN, PENJANA, PERMAI, PEMERKASA, PEMERKASA PLUS, and PEMULIH as fiscal instruments implemented to recover the economy. In the Shared Prosperity Vision 2030 which aims to establish and enlarge the business ecosystem and industry in Malaysia, fiscal sustainability is pursued through sustained government financing and strengthened investor confidence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call