Abstract

The political transformation taking place in Central European countries at the turn of 1980s and 1990s influenced, among other aspects, the methods of nature protection and making it available for tourism. The changes taking place at that time have been traced in the article on the example of three sandstone landscapes, which belong to the most popular geotouristic attractions of the Czech Republic and Poland: Prachov Rocks Nature Reserve with adjacent fragments of the Bohemian Paradise Protected Landscape Area, Adršpach-Teplice Rocks National Nature Reserve and the Table Mountains National Park. These changes were analysed on the basis of transformations of the networks of hiking trails and development of other tourism facilities within the boundaries of the protected areas. Analysis covers the entire period from the end of communism (1980s) up to present days. According to the study, in the case of all analysed protected areas, the systemic transformation in Central Europe played an important role as a factor affecting the network of hiking trails. In each case, however, local factors were also important. The biggest changes occurred in the Adršpach-Teplice Rocks and the Table Mountains. In the first case, the number and distribution of visitors needed to be controlled, leading to modification of route network. The main reason of its significant reduction was to separate paid routes from those not charged. In the Table Mountains, the network was substantially developed as a consequence of the establishment of a national park there and the political changes at the turn of twentieth and twenty-first centuries which opened the border zone and forced the marking of new tourist trails. In the Prachov Rocks, the existing layout of hiking trails has been largely kept unchanged because the continuous intensive tourist traffic did not allow any reductions, even if these would help to protect the environment. On the other hand, the network was really well developed, that it did not require further growth. Today’s networks of tourist trails in the Prachov Rocks and some parts of the Table Mountains seem too developed, taking into account the protective regime of both areas. In terms of interpretation of geoheritage, the most extensive and targeted offer can be found in the Table Mountains National Park. Referring to the methods used, the graph theory cannot be applied easily to tourist trails networks, especially when a dissected landscape is analysed. A simple but very helpful indicator illustrating the development of the network is the density of tourist trails per square kilometre.

Highlights

  • As a result of political changes at the turn of the 1980s and 1990s, the countries of Central Europe, hitherto under the in- 25 Page 2 of 30Geoheritage (2020) 12: 25 individual countries—the land was either returned to their former owners or transferred to private owners, social organisations and companies on various terms, but in both Poland and the Czech Republic, a significant portion of land, mostly forests and protected lands, are still owned by the state

  • Three areas were selected for the research (Fig. 1): (1) Prachov Rocks Nature Reserve (Czech Přírodní rezervace Prachovské skály) with adjacent fragments of the Bohemian Paradise Protected Landscape Area (Czech Chráněná krajinná oblast Český ráj) in the Czech Republic, (2) Adršpach-Teplice Rocks National Nature Reserve (Czech Národní přírodní rezervace Adšpašsko-teplické skály) in the Czech Republic, (3) Table Mountains National Park (Polish Park Narodowy Gór Stołowych) in Poland

  • Trails in adjacent areas are primarily intended to lead to the Prachov Rocks from neighbouring towns (Jičín, Sobotka, Mladějov, Libuň, Železnice, Valdice), providing access from numerous accommodation facilities and public transport stops around the area

Read more

Summary

25 Page 2 of 30

Geoheritage (2020) 12: 25 individual countries—the land was either returned to their former owners or transferred to private owners, social organisations (including church) and companies on various terms, but in both Poland and the Czech Republic, a significant portion of land, mostly forests and protected lands, are still owned by the state. Geoparks are being created, being part of national, European and global networks.1 In the article, these issues are analysed for areas important for their geoheritage, and from the perspective of changes in tourist trails offer, which is a novelty comparing to other current works. The multiplicity of factors affecting the network of tourist routes means that a universal model of its development in protected areas cannot be determined In the article, these relationships will be shown on the example of three regions extremely popular among both homeland and foreign tourists, covered by various forms of nature conservation. All three localities are concerned crucial examples of geoheritage in Central Europe

Aims and Methods
25 Page 4 of 30
25 Page 6 of 30
25 Page 8 of 30
25 Page 10 of 30
Results
25 Page 12 of 30
25 Page 16 of 30
25 Page 18 of 30
25 Page 20 of 30
25 Page 22 of 30
25 Page 24 of 30
Discussion
25 Page 26 of 30
Conclusions
25 Page 28 of 30
25 Page 30 of 30
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call