Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To improve our understanding of older informal caregivers’ (ICs) health, this paper aimed to compare multidimensional frailty and sociodemographic and economic characteristics between (subgroups of) older ICs and non-caregivers. Methods Using data originating from the Belgian Ageing studies (n = 6054), intergroup differences between older ICs and non-caregivers and between care-dependent and -independent older ICs/non-caregivers were conducted. In addition binary logistic regressions were carried out to determine which variables were related to caregiver status and need of assistance. Results Among all respondents, 14.3% were ICs reporting care needs themselves. Informal and non-caregivers with care needs, relative to those without, more often only (partially) completed primary education, were significantly older, more likely to be female and widowed, found it more difficult to make ends meet, and reported higher levels of frailty in each domain. Moreover, environmental and psychological frailty were associated with an increase in the likelihood of reporting need of assistance among older non-caregivers and ICs, respectively. Conclusions This study revealed a particular vulnerable subpopulation of older ICs with care needs. Clinical Implications It is essential for clinicians to be observant for unrecognized frailty and care needs in older ICs and to develop targeted intervention and prevention strategies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.