The Vortex Effect in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Abstract

To describe the physical principles of the vortex effect to better understand its applicability in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) procedures. Two acrylic phantom models were built based on the cross-sectional area (CSA) ratio of a MIP nephroscope and access sheaths (15/16F and 21/22F MIP-M™, Karl Storz®). The nephroscope phantom was 10mm in diameter. The access sheaths had diameters of 14mm (CSA ratio: 0.69) and 20mm (CSA ratio: 0.30). The models were adapted to generate hydrolysis, and hydrogen bubbles enhanced flow visualization on a green laser background. After calibration, the experimental flow rate was set to 12.0mL/s. Three 30-second trials assessing the flow were performed with each model. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were completed to determine the speed and pressure profiles. In both models, as the incoming fluid from the nephroscope phantom attempted to move toward the collecting system, a stagnation point (SP) was demonstrated. No fluid entered the collecting system phantom. Utilizing the 14mm-sheath, we observed a random generation of several vortices and a pressure gradient (PG) of 114.4N/m2 between the nephroscope's tip and SP. In contrast, examining the 20mm-sheath revealed a significantly smaller PG (19.4N/m2) and no noticeable vortices were noted. The speed of the fluid and equipment geometry regulate the PG and the vortices field, which are responsible for the production of the vortex effect. Considering the same flow rate, a higher ratio between the CSA of the nephroscope and access sheath results in improved efficacy of the vortex effect.