Abstract

Water proton T 1-NMRD profiles of the Gd(H 2O) 8 3+ complex have been recorded at three temperatures and at four concentrations of glycerol. The analysis is performed using both the generalized Solomon–Bloembergen–Morgan (GSBM) theory [J. Magn. Reson. 167(2004), 147–160], and the stochastic Liouville approach (SLA). The GSBM approach uses a two processes dynamic model of the zero-field splitting (ZFS) correlation function whereas SLA uses a single process model. Both models reproduce the proton T 1-NMRD profiles well. However, the model parameters extracted from the two analyses, yield different ESR X-band spectra which moreover do not reproduce the experimental ESR spectra. It is shown that the analyses of the proton T 1-NMRD profiles recorded for a solution Gd(H 2O) 8 3+ ions are relatively insensitive to the slow modulation part of dynamic model of the ZFS interaction correlation function. The description of the electron spin system results in a very small static ZFS, while recent ESR lineshape analysis indicates that the contribution from the static ZFS is important. Analysis of proton T 1-NMRD profiles of Gd(H 2O) 8 3+ complex do result in a description of the electron spin system but these microscopic parameters are uncertain unless they also are tested in a ESR-lineshape analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call