Abstract

The rubber hand illusion refers to the observation that participants perceive “body ownership” for a rubber hand if it moves, or is stroked in synchrony with the participant's real (covered) hand. Research indicates that events targeting artificial body parts can trigger affective responses (affective resonance) only with perceived body ownership, while neuroscientific findings suggest affective resonance irrespective of ownership (e.g., when observing other individuals under threat). We hypothesized that this may depend on the severity of the event. We first replicated previous findings that the rubber hand illusion can be extended to virtual hands—the virtual-hand illusion. We then tested whether hand ownership and affective resonance (assessed by galvanic skin conductance) are modulated by the experience of an event that either “impacted” (a ball hitting the hand) or “threatened” (a knife cutting the hand) the virtual hand. Ownership was stronger if the virtual hand moved synchronously with the participant's own hand, but this effect was independent from whether the hand was impacted or threatened. Affective resonance was mediated by ownership however: In the face of mere impact, participants showed more resonance in the synchronous condition (i.e., with perceived ownership) than in the asynchronous condition. In the face of threat, in turn, affective resonance was independent of synchronicity—participants were emotionally involved even if a threat was targeting a hand that they did not perceive as their own. Our findings suggest that perceived body ownership and affective responses to body-related impact or threat can be dissociated and are thus unlikely to represent the same underlying process. We argue that affective reactions to impact are produced in a top-down fashion if the impacted effector is assumed to be part of one's own body, whereas threatening events trigger affective responses more directly in a bottom-up fashion—irrespective of body ownership.

Highlights

  • In the “rubber-hand illusion” (RHI) first reported by Botvinick and Cohen (1998), people feel that a rubber hand lying in front of them belongs to their own body if the rubber hand and their own unseen hand are being stroked synchronously

  • Given that the numerical effects tended to be more pronounced for the conditions with tactile stimulation, we kept this setup for our experiment

  • Even though we compared synchronous and asynchronous conditions while Yuan and Steed compared a synchronous virtual hand with a synchronous virtual arrow, the outcomes are comparable: conditions that induce perceived hand ownership are associated with greater affective responses if the

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the “rubber-hand illusion” (RHI) first reported by Botvinick and Cohen (1998), people feel that a rubber hand lying in front of them belongs to their own body if the rubber hand and their own unseen hand are being stroked synchronously. This observation has been replicated and extended in various studies. Sanchez-Vives et al (2010) showed that a virtual hand illusion (VHI) can be induced even in the absence of tactile stimulation, by manipulating the temporal delay between the participant’s own movement (as measured by a data glove) and the movements of the virtual hand on a screen. A common method is to present participants with visual 3D images of the virtual hand on a screen in front of them, in some cases together with tactile stimulation of their real, hidden hand (Padilla et al, 2010). Sanchez-Vives et al (2010) showed that a virtual hand illusion (VHI) can be induced even in the absence of tactile stimulation, by manipulating the temporal delay between the participant’s own movement (as measured by a data glove) and the movements of the virtual hand on a screen. Slater et al (2008) found reliable correlations between the impression of hand ownership and hand-related EMG activation, suggesting a connection between perceived ownership and action control

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call