Abstract

Minimally invasive fracture fixation can be technically demanding, especially in body regions characterised by complex bone anatomy and the presence of a significant amount of soft tissue. Hence, this procedure is associated with a high risk of implant malposition. As a consequence, radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon increases within surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practicability and accuracy of a newly designed virtual isocentric aiming device (VIAD) as compared to the more traditional approach of the freehand insertion of K-wires. Forty polyurethane foam blocks were prepared with a reference wire (W ( R )) and covered by sponge material to simulate soft tissue. For the sake of comparison, both an untrained and an experienced surgeon were selected for the study and were advised to insert a K-wire into the foam block so as to have the same axis as the W ( R ) using both of the aforementioned methods. The clinical parameters of both techniques were analysed. In addition, 3-D precision data computed using CT-scans of each sample were evaluated. Device adjustment prolonged the time required for the experienced surgeon to complete the VIAD procedure when compared to the freehand method. However, using the VIAD, the number of plane changes made to the image intensifier in addition to the number of drill trials was significantly reduced by each surgeon. Furthermore, mechanical K-wire navigation leads to a decrease in the radiation exposure time for the untrained surgeon. VIAD-guided K-wires revealed a significant lower angle of deviation in relation to W ( R ). Tip-to-tip and tip-to-axis distances displayed a trend indicating reduced displacement values as well. The VIAD allows for simple wire insertion with increased precision as well as a reduction in radiation exposure, plane changes of the image intensifier and the number of drill trials compared to the freehand method. The VIAD also satisfies the demand for a less invasive technique. Prospectively, the VIAD represents a useful and cost-effective alternative to the freehand method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.