Abstract
ABSTRACT When one looks from a feminist and critical point of view at how the Symbolic is created through the structure of the Master’s Discourse, one finds a necessary exclusion of specific signifiers and objects through which the subject can engage in processes of identification. This exclusion, far from being naturally given, results from power relations and hegemonic struggles to impose a Master Signifier that allows the subject to emerge. Following the idea that our current Hegemonic Symbolic (HS) is patriarchal, this article poses questions around the idea of a possible feminist Symbolic, the rejection of the Symbolic, and the articulation of intersectionality from a psychoanalytical approach that proposes to shift from identity politics to politics of identification. The speculative nature of this article aims at illustrating different outcomes and paradoxes while focusing on two specific legislative processes by the Spanish Ministry of Equality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.