The Views of Regulators Around the World

Asset-backed securities (ABS), 147 Asset-backed tokenization, 153 Asset-backed tokens (ABTs), 6, 146, 150-154 background, 148-150 benefits of tokenization, 154-155 capital requirements, 171-172 case studies, 156-161 challenges, 155-156 consultation outcomes, 173-176 general principles, 168-171 regulatory issues, 168-176 risks of permissionless DLTS and smart contracts, 161-168 Asset-pricing relationships comparison of cryptocurrency and equity market factors, 100-103 cryptocurrency pricing by equity and crypto factors, 104-108 cryptocurrency pricing by global and regional factors, 108-109 data, 98-100 Association of Proprietary Traders (APT), 174 Auto loans, 154 Automated teller machines (ATMs), 17

Central banks worldwide are coming to terms with the bits and bytes of digital money, commonly referred to as Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). CBDC has been claimed to be safer, more secure, and inherently less volatile, unlike cryptocurrencies, as it is issued and regulated by central banks. The development of digital currency not only emerged in, and isolated developed countries’ monetary policy but also came from the emerging markets. However, the policy and academic discussion on CBDC is clouded as only a significant minority of states have instituted it. From a regulatory point of view, the basic concept of CBDC is still significantly understudied. Among the emerging scholarship, there remains a paucity of study on the (legal) aspects of cybersecurity risk and resilience of the proposed CBDC. This paper explores the role of Bank Indonesia (BI), as the central bank, in implementing CBDC and conducts a preliminary expose associated with cybersecurity risks. This paper shows that CBDC understood as not only usage of Digital Ledger Technologies, (DLTs), but in all models of electronic payment. There are diverging models for the implementation of CBDC, some models involve multiple actors and electronic systems. However, as a currency the Central Bank would ultimately bear the liability for each transaction. Therefore, it is important for BI, as the central bank, consider cybersecurity risks associated with the implementation of CBDC. Cybersecurity risks in the financial sectors including CBDC, is the potential disruption caused by cyber-attacks, IT failures, personnel, and physical or infrastructure security risks.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to describe the present taxonomy of money, summarize potential central bank digital currency (CBDC) regimes that central banks worldwide could adopt and explore the implications of the introduction of each of these CDBC regimes for money laundering through the lens of the regulatory dialectic theory.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology used in the analysis of significant recent events regarding the progress of central banks in establishing a CBDC and the implications for money laundering under a CBDC regime. This paper also reviews the literature regarding the Regulatory Dialectic to highlight potential innovative responses of money launderers to circumvent the controls generated through the implementation of a CBDC.FindingsThis study examines the impact of Kane’s regulatory dialectic paradigm on the feasibility of money laundering under a CBDC regime and identifies potential avenues that would be available for those seeking to launder money, based on the form a CBDC would take.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper is unable as of yet to empirically evaluate anti-money laundering (AML) tactics under a CBDC regime as it has not yet been fully implemented.Practical implicationsMany central banks worldwide are evaluating the structure of and introduction of a CBDC. There are a number of forms that a CBDC could take, each of which has implications for individual privacy and for entities involved in AML efforts within financial institutions and the regulatory community. The paper has implications for AML experts who are considering how AML procedures would change under a CBDC regime.Social implicationsThe regulatory dialectic predicts that regulatory response reactive, rather than proactive when it comes to socially undesirable phenomena. As central banks and governments seek to divert economic activity away from the laundering of the proceeds of illicit activity, there are tradeoffs in terms of a loss of privacy. The regulatory dialectic predicts a corresponding innovative response of those who wish to undermine the controls generated through the establishment of a CBDC.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to explore the impact of a potential CBDC on money laundering and the potential innovative circumventions within the paradigm of the Regulatory Dialectic.

This study employs a systematic review of the literature to critically analyze the privacy implications of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Against the backdrop of a global digital revolution spurred by financial crises and the rise of cryptocurrencies, the emergence of CBDCs has garnered substantial attention from central banks worldwide. The study’s main objective is to fill a significant gap in the literature by providing an evidence-based assessment of the privacy issues of CBDCs. Through a meticulous analysis of the 46 selected papers, the study identifies key findings, including diverse perspectives on CBDC models, aspects and gaps in CBDC research, and various privacy concerns, such as extensive data collection in the direct CBDC model, challenges related to central bank data retention in the hybrid CBDC model, and increased operational complexity in the intermediated CBDC approach associated with CBDC implementation. The critical analysis points toward the urgent need for more extensive research into the privacy and security aspects of CBDCs to ensure user protection and trust. The findings contribute valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, and stakeholders in shaping the responsible creation and use of CBDCs.

The banking sector has been greatly impacted by the technological outburst of the twenty-first century. Bitcoin, the first crypto asset created on block chain technology, has firmly established itself in the financial sector since its introduction in 2009. The market capitalization of uncontrolled crypto assets has grown at an unprecedented rate, posing a threat to the banking industry and the economy. Illegal activities such as terrorist funding and money laundering find refuge in the unregulated world of crypto assets. To keep up with the demands of the computer-savvy Generation Next, banks worldwide have adopted various technologies and improved their service standards. However, central banks continue to follow the traditional system of issuing hard currency bank notes, which do not match the aspirations of most end users. As a result, Central Banks worldwide are currently brainstorming the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). This study aims to explore the theoretical aspect, feasibility, and status of CBDC. Four Central Banks have already issued CBDC, while others are in the process of doing so. Block chain under Distributed Ledger Technology is the most suitable and widely accepted platform for issuing CBDC. Robust computer security measures must be established to prevent hacking and ensure monetary stability for CBDC. During the initial stages of CBDC implementation, hard currency banknotes and CBDC will run parallelly until any possible initial hiccups are resolved. CBDC has the potential to boost banking and finance, trade finance, and cross-border international settlements.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a digital version of domestic currency with a unit of account equivalent to its domestic currency. Blockchain or Distributed Ledger technology (DLT) can be used to implement CBDC to execute and settle peer-to-peer transactions. With the emergence of private money, such as cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, and the growing use of digital payments to lessen the global pandemic spread, CBDC is an active research area among central banks worldwide. Many central banks started their CBDC projects by building DLT proofs of concept (PoCs) to replicate wholesale payment systems and expand their investigation into other use cases, such as delivery versus Payment (DvP) and cross-border remittance. Many large economies like the United States have projects exploring CBDC. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC), China Central Bank, has already started a pilot testing of their digital retail currency. This paper discusses the application of blockchain for CBDC by presenting CBDC projects by central banks. Moreover, this paper analyses issues, identify challenges and discusses future works in this rapidly evolving field.

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to analyze effect of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) on the global financial system's stability in Kenya. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in Kenya could enhance financial inclusion and reduce transaction costs, particularly for the unbanked. However, risks such as cybersecurity threats, financial disintermediation, and impacts on traditional banking systems exist. CBDCs could also give central banks more control over monetary policy. While offering benefits, their success depends on strong regulatory frameworks, technological infrastructure, and addressing privacy concerns. Careful implementation and international coordination are essential for ensuring financial stability in Kenya's ecosystem. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Financial intermediation theory, theoretical framework of financial stability & network effects theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effect of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) on the global financial system's stability in Kenya. Central banks should adopt a cautious and incremental approach to CBDC implementation, as recommended. Governments and central banks worldwide must engage in international dialogues to ensure coordinated approaches to CBDC adoption.

The introduction of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a game-changer in the world of global money. Given the digital realm reforming monetary systems, central banks are getting keen on CBDCs to offer a state-backed alternative to private digital currencies and payment systems. This paper aims at carrying out a brief analysis of CBDCs and their impact on monetary sovereignty in view of globalization, technological disruption and rising decentralized finance. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) hold promise for bolstering the state’s monetary policy. However, they also pose various challenges to the financial stability of states and cross-border payments involving CBDCs. The study also mentions the changing character of the role of central banks such as the Reserve Bank of India and compares international approaches like the digital yuan of China and the digital euro of the European Union. The paper concludes that CBDCs represent an instrument to strengthen monetary sovereignty as well as a catalyst to redefine monetary sovereignty in the digital age. INTRODUCTION The Money has changed from bartering to metallic coins, paper currency, and now digital currency. Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin have been rising in value at a rapid rate in recent years. As a result, the dollar value and stock markets have been challenged. Decentralized digital currencies trade without a central authority which threatens to undermine the sovereignty of money. #Centralization In this context, countries’ central banks around the world have started to investigate the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). It is a digital form of the sovereign currency that the state issues and regulates. CBDCs are regulated by an authority unlike cryptocurrencies which are decentralized and do not have a backing of a central authority over them. In a rapidly digitalizing economy, states are striving to gain more control over the monetary and financial system.At the heart of this debate surrounding the eurozone members and their exceptional trade ties with Europe lies monetary sovereignty. The emergence of digital currencies private and state raises questions of the future of this sovereignty.The study aims to critically analyze the interrelationship between CBDCs and monetary sovereignty. The implementation of CBDCs allow the central banks to strengthen their control over the monetary authority and also reveal the risks it carry.

The quantity of electronic currency in circulation within the community experienced a substantial increase between 2017 and 2022. However, the quantity of electronic currency in circulation in 2021 has declined compared to 2020 and 2022. Furthermore, the emergence of central bank digital currency (CBDC) as a digital currency has problems that cannot be avoided; these problems arise from policies or regulations and understanding of the public and business people and are related to the security of digital currency users. The Bank of Indonesia deems it imperative to address this by implementing suitable policies. The policy encompasses digital payments and financial services, including Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Central banks worldwide are encouraged to develop Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to enhance monetary policy effectiveness. The objective is to guarantee financial stability and enhance the effectiveness and resilience of the payment system. This study aims to examine the concept of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) as a novel electronic payment tool for social entrepreneurs. The research approach employed in this study was descriptive qualitative with data forecasting. The findings of this study indicate that Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) has the potential to be utilized as a payment instrument by social entrepreneurs.

Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a digital version of domestic currency with the unit of account equivalent to its domestic currency. Blockchain can be used to implement CBDC to execute and settle peer-to-peer transactions. With the emergence of private money such as cryptocurrencies and stable coins and the growing use of digital payments to lessen the global pandemic spread, CBDC is an active research area among the central banks worldwide. Many central banks started their CBDC projects by building proofs of concept (PoCs) to replicate wholesale payment systems and expand their investigation into other use cases such as delivery versus Payment (DvP) and cross-border remittance. PBoC, China Central Bank, has already started a pilot testing of their digital currency. This paper discusses the application of blockchain for CBDC by presenting CBDC projects by central banks. Moreover, this paper analyses issues, identify challenges, and discusses future works in this rapidly evolving field.

Central bank digital currencies (CBDC) have been implemented by some countries and trialled by many more. The consumer has an increasing range of financial services to choose from including decentralised blockchain-based cryptocurrencies. A CBDC may use blockchain technology, but it is centralized, so the institutions that support it play an important role. Despite the centralised top-down nature of this financial technology, it still needs to be adopted so the consumer’s perspective, particularly their trust in it, is very important. Each CBDC implementation can be different, and each country’s context can be different, therefore it is important to understand each case separately. This research models the Brazilian consumer’s trust in their two-tier CBDC, where the central bank and the retail banks retain their current role. The six ways to build trust in a CBDC, identified by previous research in a different region, are supported for this case also. These are: (a) Trust in government and central bank offering the CBDC, (b) expressed guarantees for those using it, (c) the favourable reputation of other active CBDCs, (d) the CBDC technology, the automation and limited human involvement necessary, (e) the trust building features of the retail bank’s CBDC wallet app, and (f) the privacy features of the retail bank’s CBDC wallet app and back-end processes.

An overview of the definitions of central bank digital currency (CBDC), formulated by researchers of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the Bank of England, is presented, and the essence of the CBDC is revealed. It is stated that the existing electronic money is a digital form of obligations of financial intermediaries, and CBDC is a form of emission and obligations of central banks. The types and forms of CBDC are generalized, namely: retail or wholesale, account-based or token-based ones. The structure and functionality of the register, payment authentication, access to infrastructure, and governance are defined as factors taken into account during CBDC designing. Similar models of launching national CBDC by the Bank of England (economy-wide access or financial institutions access, and financial institutions plus CBDC backed narrow bank access) and BIS (direct, indirect, hybrid) are under consideration. The synthetic CBDCs are marked as a theoretical concept of CBDC. The overview of projects of the People's Bank of China – "e-renminbi", the Central Bank of the Uruguay – "e-peso", the Central Bank of the Bahamas – "sand dollar" and the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank affirm the interest of developing countries in launching national retail CBDCs. It was found that apart from the Riksbank with the successful "e-krona" project, most of the monetary authorities of developed countries (BIS, Bank of Japan, Bank of Canada, Deutsche Bank, FRS) are just planning or starting to experiment with the issuance of digital securities, which demonstrates their concern about the restructuring of the banking system and the changes of global role of traditional currencies. Among the positive consequences of the introduction of CBDC for the domestic banking system are the emergence of an alternative payment instrument, the implementation of effective monetary policy through increased influence on interest rates, and regulation of the legal regime of crypto currencies. At the same time, the introduction of CBDC involves certain changes in financial intermediation (replacement of the deposits of commercial banks with the CBDC, the performance of functions inherent to commercial banks by the central bank or fintech companies), and will require powerful technical capabilities, including those related to protection from cyber risks. The results of the study point to the need for a cautious approach to the implementation of the Ukrainian CBDC only after the NBU assesses the public demand for new forms of money and the impact of the launch of CBDC models on price and financial stability, and compares available payment technologies that can achieve the same goals as the CBDC.

Introduction/Main Objectives: Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is an electronic form of banknotes, but different from virtual currency or cryptocurrency which are not issued by the state, the CBDC issued and guaranteed by the central bank. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of CBDC on financial stability using a Vector Auto-regressive model. The endogenous variables in the VAR estimation contain the Central Bank Digital Currency Attention Index (CBDCA), composite stock price index, real exchange rate, and interest rate (BI7DRR). Background Problems: The presence of CBDC will change the objective of Bank Indonesia and influence the structure of the monetary policy, which is no longer focused on achieving a low and stable inflation rate but on achieving price stability. Novelty: Although CBDCs will be launched worldwide, there are a limited number of empirical studies that have analyzed their impact on financial stability, especially for the case study in Indonesia. In this paper, we also use the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) model with stochastic volatility and Impulse Response Function to make a forecast and see the impacts of shocks on the financial variables. Research Methods: In this study, we used monthly time series data from January 2019 – January 2023. In order to find the correlation between CBDC and the financial market we used the Granger causality model and impulse response function analysis. Finding/Results: The results of this study prove that CBDC has a positive correlation with the real exchange rate, and financial markets such as stock or bond prices have a positive response to shocks in CBDC. Conclusion: In this study, we used monthly time series data from January 2019 – January 2023. We use empirical tests to examine the CBDC attention index in relation to index attention, exchange rates, interest rates and IHSG. Our empirical results show that in Granger causality there is no causal relationship between CBDC and other macroeconomic variables. whereas in the IRF analysis, the response to the CBDC shock tends to be stagnant, the FEVD results show short-term and long-term shock fluctuations in the CBDC and other variables. These results indicate that CBDC does not have a significant effect on the macroeconomic variables used as indicators of financial system stability, but on the contrary, people's attention to CBDC depends on the condition of the variables in the financial system. On the other hand, the development of CBDC depends on economic conditions. The uncertainty surrounding CBDC plays an important role in indicating that the introduction of CBDC brings significant changes to the economy.

Central Banks and the Future of Money

Objectives: This work aims to contribute towards Tanzanian Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) users’ privacy preservation. It proposes the design of a privacy preserving CBDC which might be issued by Tanzania's Central Bank (CB), the Bank of Tanzania (BoT), which is currently in CBDC research phase. The work also aims to contribute to literature, the CBDC research being done by BoT, other CBs and CBDC stakeholders around the world. Methods: By using the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, a privacy preserving CBDC design suitable for Tanzania was proposed, demonstrated and evaluated. This is the result of existing literature showing that different countries have different CBDC designs due to their differences in contexts and purposes for CBDC issuance. This consequently emphasized the fact that a CBDC design should not be treated as a one-size fits all solution. Findings: As opposed to the existing general and other country specific CBDC designs, we proposed a privacy preserving CBDC design suitable for Tanzania by consulting literature and taking into consideration the Tanzanian context. The design appears to be promising Tanzanian CBDC users’ privacy preservation though further work needs to be done. The work should not only be on practical evaluation of the proposed design but also on other factors impacting the success of CBDC projects. This will consequently further increase the success probability of CBDC projects, hence the potential for practical realization of CBDC project benefits. Novelty: Existing literature has shown that, considering the countries’ differences in context and CBDC issuance purposes, CBDC design should not be treated as a generic solution thereby obliging the need for country-specific CBDC designs. Consequently, the privacy preserving CBDC design suitable specifically for Tanzania consists of and provides an outline of privacy preserving interactions among the identified key Tanzanian CBDC participants or actors. The actors are the BoT, the intermediaries (i.e., other banks and payment service providers), Tanzania’s National Identification Authority (NIDA), financial transactions violation detection engine, and the expected CBDC users. Keywords: Digital currency, database privacy, central bank digital currency, privacy