Abstract

In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and also in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. For the next 20 years, between 1988 and 2008, impulsive testing of individual SCC function could only be accurately done by a few aficionados with the time and money to support scleral search-coil systems—an expensive, complicated and cumbersome, semi-invasive technique that never made the transition from the research lab to the dizzy clinic. Then, in 2009 and 2013, we introduced a video method of testing function of each of the six canals individually. Since 2009, the method has been taken up by most dizzy clinics around the world, with now close to 100 refereed articles in PubMed. In many dizzy clinics around the world, video Head Impulse Testing has supplanted caloric testing as the initial and in some cases the final test of choice in patients with suspected vestibular disorders. Here, we consider seven current, interesting, and controversial aspects of video Head Impulse Testing: (1) introduction to the test; (2) the progress from the head impulse protocol (HIMPs) to the new variant—suppression head impulse protocol (SHIMPs); (3) the physiological basis for head impulse testing; (4) practical aspects and potential pitfalls of video head impulse testing; (5) problems of vestibulo-ocular reflex gain calculations; (6) head impulse testing in central vestibular disorders; and (7) to stay right up-to-date—new clinical disease patterns emerging from video head impulse testing. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world.

Highlights

  • In 1984, we tested a patient with bilateral vestibular schwannomas who had had both vestibular nerves surgically sectioned [1]

  • The results showed a continuous spectrum of vestibulo-ocular response (VOR) gains on head impulse testing in different patients from almost normal to complete bilateral vestibular loss (BVL)

  • There are synergistic movements of both eyes—both eyes rotate to compensate for head turn and so both eyes remain on the fixation target during the head turn. While these excitatory processes are in action, there are exactly complementary effects exerted by projections from the right labyrinth; the head turn acts to silence the primary afferents from the right semicircular canal (SCC), so they project less excitation to the right vestibular nucleus, resulting in reduced excitation of the left abducens and reduced activation of the right medial rectus

Read more

Summary

The Video Head Impulse Test

Later we showed that it was possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world.

INTRODUCTION
The Standard HIT
The SHIMP Variant
THE PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE HIT
PRACTICAL ASPECTS AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF VIDEO HEAD IMPULSE TESTING
Pitfalls in Video Head Impulse Testing
Head Motion Measurement
Eye Movement Measurement
Basic Geometrical Considerations
CALCULATING VOR GAIN
QUANTITATIVE HIT IN CENTRAL VESTIBULAR DISORDERS
Acute Vestibular Syndrome
Specific Central Vestibular Lesions
Metabolic Disorders
Superior Vestibular Neuritis
Inferior Vestibular Neuritis
Anterior SCC Sparing
Unilateral and Bilateral Loss of PC Function
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call