The vernacularisation of global rights discourses and social protection in regional African arena

Abstract

International organisations have increasingly advocated a rights-based approach to social protection, especially in Africa, despite persistent criticisms from some African scholars that the globally dominant discourse of human rights reflects a specifically ‘western’ ideology. Regional African inter-governmental organisations have occupied a frontline between international organisations and national governments in ‘vernacularising’ global rights, that is, incorporating some ‘African’ norms and values into the universal claims of the dominant global discourse. This has entailed an emphasis on broadly communitarian responsibilities and obligations (including but not limited to the family and kin) alongside individual claims. The process of vernacularisation has been limited, however, in that it entails the adaptation of exogenous statements about rights. These tend to overlook the specific needs and claims of poor farmers and fail to recognise the full extent to which communitarian norms and values in Africa challenge the predominant global discourse.