Abstract

In rational conformal field theory, the Verlinde formula computes the fusion coefficients from the modular S-transformations of the characters of the chiral algebra's representations. Generalising this formula to logarithmic models has proven rather difficult for a variety of reasons. Here, a recently proposed formalism [1] for the modular properties of certain classes of logarithmic theories is reviewed, and refined, using simple examples. A formalism addressing fusion rules in simple current extensions is also reviewed as a means to tackle logarithmic theories to which the proposed modular formalism does not directly apply.

Highlights

  • Logarithmic conformal field theory typically refers to a two-dimensional conformally invariant quantum field theory for which there exist correlation functions exhibiting logarithmic singularities

  • The determination of the fusion rules in rational theories is often significantly simplified through the use of the Verlinde formula [45]. This relies on computing the modular S-transformations of the characters of the irreducible representations. It has been known for quite some time [46] that the irreducible characters of a logarithmic conformal field theory need not carry a representation of the modular group, an observation which appears to completely invalidate the application of any Verlinde-type formula

  • Rather than try to compare and contrast these proposals, which would be a worthy goal in itself, we shall instead turn to a rather different formalism which has recently been introduced [1] for modular properties and Verlinde formulae in a more general class of logarithmic conformal field theories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Logarithmic conformal field theory typically refers to a two-dimensional conformally invariant quantum field theory for which there exist correlation functions exhibiting logarithmic singularities. It has been known for quite some time [46] that the irreducible characters of a logarithmic conformal field theory need not carry a representation of the modular group, an observation which appears to completely invalidate the application of any Verlinde-type formula.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call