Abstract

The construction of exclosures along two of the most important rivers in the Kruger National Park was done to investigate how patterns of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the riparian zone is affected by fire, flood and herbivory. To assist this research programme, vegetation surveys were conducted within exclosures along the Letaba River to classify and map the vegetation of the area. The history and experimental design of the Letaba exclosures are similar to that of the Nkhuhlu exclosures along the Sabie River, which is directly related to questions surrounding elephant management. The main difference between the Nkhuhlu and Letaba exclosures is local heterogeneity, since the latter lies within the Mopaneveld, which is floristically and physiognomically much more homogenous than the vegetation of the southern Kruger National Park. Nevertheless, four plant communities, eight sub-communities and six variants were recognised and mapped for the Letaba exclosures. The vegetation description was done in relation to prevailing soil forms, differences in species richness, diversity and community structure, and therefore should serve as a basis for further detailed and broad-based botanical studies. Vegetation mapping was done to sub-community level and, where possible, to variant level. As expected in Mopaneveld vegetation, the plant communities could broadly be related to soil types, although smaller-scale variations correspond to soil moisture availability because the Mopaneveld is considered ‘event-driven’, especially in the herbaceous layer.Conservation implications: Floristic surveying and vegetation mapping of a long-term monitoring site, such as the Letaba exclosures, is seen as a baseline inventory to assist natural resource management. Linking mapping units to biodiversity strengthens the understanding needed to maintain biodiversity in all its natural facets and fluxes.

Highlights

  • Bignoniaceae Shrub| + | +. |. |. . |. |. . |. |. . |. |. . | . | +. |. |. . | . | +. | . | +. |. |. . + +. | . . + +. a | . 1 1 +. . | + +. . . . | + +. + + + | +. . + +. | +. + + +. | . + + +. + | . . . +. + | . + + . . . | +. . |. . . . | | . 1. . | | +. . + | |. . . . | | . . +. | | . +. . | |. . . . | |. . . . | |. . . . | |. . . . |

  • Schkuhria pinnataSenna obtusifolia* Senna occidentalis* Sesbania sesban Sida dregei Tacazzea apiculata Tephrosia multijuga Tephrosia polystachya Terminalia sericea Tribulus terrestris Tricholaena monachne Triumfetta pilosa Turraea obtusifolia Urelytrum agropyroides Vahlia capensis Wahlenbergia undulata Withania somnifera Xanthium strumarium* Ximenia americana Ximenia caffra Ziziphus mucronata.

  • Rhamnaceae Tree|. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . | . +. |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . |. . . Letters in brackets represent growth form as follows: (a) annual; (s) succulent; (d) dwarf. *Alien species. Non-native species.

Read more

Summary

Bignoniaceae Shrub

| + | +. |. |. . |. |. . |. |. . |. |. . | . | +. |. |. . | . | +. | . | +. |. |. . + +. | . . + +. a | . 1 1 +. . | + +. . . . | + +. + + + | +. . + +. | +. + + +. | . + + +. + | . . . +. + | . + + . . . | +. . |. . . . | | . 1. . | | +. . + | |. . . . | | . . +. | | . +. . | |. . . . | |. . . . | |. . . . | |. . . . |

Schkuhria pinnata
Rhamnaceae Tree
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.