Abstract
While a negative correlation between inflation and real stock returns has been well documented, the cause of this relationship has been the subject of considerable controversy. The most plausible causal interpretation is the variability hypothesis which points to a chain from higher inflation to greater variability and uncertainty to depressed economic activity, hence generating a link between inflation and expected returns. The previous studies have not found support for this hypothesis, however, and Fama's noncausal proxy hypothesis has gained considerable currency. It is argued that there have been serious methodological problems with the previous tests of the variability hypothesis. When these are corrected, we find strong support for the causal variability hypothesis in the post war data for the United States.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.